Over the years I have been sued six or seven times mostly for wrongful discharge, only time I lost was kind of strange.
One of our service techs was selling used equipment into one of our current accounts,
When the tech installed new equipment he would buy some of the de-installed equipment from that customer and resell it to another customer who was wanting to add on but not buy new.
When the salesman complained to the techs manager he called me for directions. I told him to fire the tech, it is in the employee handbook he can't do that and he signed the handbook plain and simple.
The employee sued for wrongful discharge, a few months later HR calls to tell me, cancel your trip to SC the scheduled deposition has been canceled and we will settle out of court.
Since we were a large international company our corporate lawyers always hired local lawyers to represent us anytime we were sued.
According to the SC lawyer a signature is not proof the employee actually read the entire handbook, plus if it is a terminating offense it would have to be highlighted in the manual and it was not highlighted, the precedent in SC had been set in a previous trial and based on that finding we would loose if going to trial.
One of our service techs was selling used equipment into one of our current accounts,
When the tech installed new equipment he would buy some of the de-installed equipment from that customer and resell it to another customer who was wanting to add on but not buy new.
When the salesman complained to the techs manager he called me for directions. I told him to fire the tech, it is in the employee handbook he can't do that and he signed the handbook plain and simple.
The employee sued for wrongful discharge, a few months later HR calls to tell me, cancel your trip to SC the scheduled deposition has been canceled and we will settle out of court.
Since we were a large international company our corporate lawyers always hired local lawyers to represent us anytime we were sued.
According to the SC lawyer a signature is not proof the employee actually read the entire handbook, plus if it is a terminating offense it would have to be highlighted in the manual and it was not highlighted, the precedent in SC had been set in a previous trial and based on that finding we would loose if going to trial.