1, 2, 3 don't apply here. So in this case there must be a goal #4. Maybe to benefit the proponents? In particular if the proceeds from selling off national assets are then 'invested' in a Ponzi scheme.
Seems pretty obvious that the goal is to cash out the crypto holders (and producers..) who've been busy openly bribing the very people suggesting this thing and leave the taxpayers in the lurch. Anyone who thinks differently is either fooling themselves or just claims otherwise because they're also hoping to cash out.