John Deere 5052R Compact Utility Tractor

   / John Deere 5052R Compact Utility Tractor #11  
You're thinking of the 5000 series where the E models are basic, and M are deluxe (plus made in the U.S.). For whatever reason, the 4000 series is different and the M is the base model, while the R is deluxe. I think they're light (3,700lbs) for the horsepower, and have a weak loader (2,200lbs to 110").

You're right. You would think they would keep that designation the same over all lines. Oh well, who can ever figure out how big corporations think.
 
   / John Deere 5052R Compact Utility Tractor #12  
Brian,
Which model are you referencing? An open station 4052 weighs 3770 lbs. and a cab is optional that brings these tractors to 4300 lbs. roughly. My 4520 cab with iron weights is about 5500 lbs.

I had taken those figures straight out of the JD brochure other than rounding the figures. These are actual numbers shown. All 4000 series OOS @ 3098lbs & the Cabs @ 3737lbs. I am only going by what is printed on the brochure. ;)
 
   / John Deere 5052R Compact Utility Tractor #13  
I had taken those figures straight out of the JD brochure other than rounding the figures. These are actual numbers shown. All 4000 series OOS @ 3098lbs & the Cabs @ 3737lbs. I am only going by what is printed on the brochure. ;)

Are you sure? That is the weight of the 3000 series.
I've got the old and new brochures as well as being a 4000 series owner and I am pretty familiar with them.
 
   / John Deere 5052R Compact Utility Tractor #15  
Are you sure? That is the weight of the 3000 series.
I've got the old and new brochures as well as being a 4000 series owner and I am pretty familiar with them.

Well, here are pictures of the front and the spec pages of the brochure that I have. I picked up new brochures at the local JD dealer before they closed down back in February. Maybe they were not so new? Still says "New 4 Family" though. :confused:
 

Attachments

  • JD_brochure_cover.jpg
    JD_brochure_cover.jpg
    439.5 KB · Views: 164
  • spec_sheet.jpg
    spec_sheet.jpg
    366.2 KB · Views: 402
   / John Deere 5052R Compact Utility Tractor #16  
Well, here are pictures of the front and the spec pages of the brochure that I have. I picked up new brochures at the local JD dealer before they closed down back in February. Maybe they were not so new? Still says "New 4 Family" though. :confused:

That's nuts.
 
   / John Deere 5052R Compact Utility Tractor #17  
You asked about similar models. Last year when I shopped tractors I was looking in the 60ish hp range. I looked at Deere's 4720 since the 4066R wasn't on any lots at the time. I also looked at Mahindra's 6010, Kubota's L6060, Massey's MF1759 and 1758, as well as Kioti's NX6010. The Kioti had the best control layout of all the cab models. The Mahindra was out due to poor quality interior and hard starting when cold (I'm in Minnesota). Massey is hands down the prettiest, but I did not like the control layout. The Kubota wasn't rugged enough for my intended use. Both the Kioti and Massey are the heaviest in the class, including Mahinda's new 2500 series that claims but isn't the heaviest in the class.

Upon seeing a Deere 4066R after the fact, I was still happy with my Kioti purchase. The Kioti NX6010R HST with loader and cab was 22K less than Deere's 4066R, 12K less than the Kubota L6060, and 6K less than a Massey MF1758.

image-1363320134.jpg

I remain happy with my purchase and would buy it again. There are now many YouTube videos of all the machines available for you to look at.
 
Last edited:
   / John Deere 5052R Compact Utility Tractor #19  
Welcome to TBN. I may be wrong but I thought the E series was the no frills line that didn't have a removable loader, etc and the M was more of a "well optioned" model and the R was top of the line. I have a similar tractor only Kubota and while I didn't need all the hp for what I do, I have definitely used it. A smaller machine could do everything I need but it is nice having the size and power. If it's what you want and don't mind the extra money I say go for it.

The e for economy in the 5 series isn't as big of a difference compared to models before. My 5055e cab has a removable h240 loader, ePTO, and all the other bells and whistles. One of the biggest differences to me from the 5E series to the 5M is the E are 45-75 hp with the same frame and layout. The M starts at 75 hp and has the option of a buddy seat and different control layout for the 3pt and remotes.

All In all I'm happy with my utility tractor purchase over a compact

Brett
 
   / John Deere 5052R Compact Utility Tractor #20  
The e for economy in the 5 series isn't as big of a difference compared to models before. My 5055e cab has a removable h240 loader, ePTO, and all the other bells and whistles. One of the biggest differences to me from the 5E series to the 5M is the E are 45-75 hp with the same frame and layout. The M starts at 75 hp and has the option of a buddy seat and different control layout for the 3pt and remotes.

All In all I'm happy with my utility tractor purchase over a compact

Brett

:thumbsup: That was the general gist of my comment. You get a ton more capacity out of the 5xxx "E" series for the same or less cost.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

HUNTER SYSTEM 700 TIRE BALANCER (A50854)
HUNTER SYSTEM 700...
2021 FORD F450 TOW TRUCK (A50505)
2021 FORD F450 TOW...
2017 Ford Explorer AWD SUV (A48082)
2017 Ford Explorer...
2014 John Deere 6125R Utility Tractor with loader (A50657)
2014 John Deere...
2016 Kia Optima Sedan (A48082)
2016 Kia Optima...
2023 Ford Explorer AWD Hybrid SUV (A48082)
2023 Ford Explorer...
 
Top