john deere 5103???

[bullsram]

Chris

I payed $5700.00 for my 553 loader but there is no comparison between the 512 or 522 and 553. The 553 is a MUCH heavier loader all around. If you could look at the two of them side by side you would see what im talking about. Later..... Bull

 

[RPW]

I've got the 5103 2wd with the 512 loader and so far it's worked real well for me. I dig with it, move large round bales (1500+ lbs), pull tree's etc. So far I've accomplished everything I've set out to do with it both in dry and wet conditions. Do I have to think about how to attack a project.... yes but if you're not thinking you'll end up in the safety forum. Seriously if your budge is somewhat tight then there's nothing wrong with it. I just couldn't justify the extra money for 4wd or the larger loaders.

 

[deere5105]

I believe the 4WD is better for loader work, but depending on the terrain and work being done it is not absolutely necessary. I believe ballasting is very important for loader work. I recently installed a 512 loader on my 5105 and have been pleased. I intentionally drove out onto a sand bar on the river a few weeks ago and was able to get a full bucket load of sand on the first try without tire spin and drive back off the bar with out incident. I considered that to be an accomplishment as sand can quickly bog you down. In my situation a 4WD would be nice for the just in case factor, but so far I have not found any situations where I needed it.