Turbys_1700
Elite Member
If you need higher FEL capacity and want adjustable lower links standard get the MX. Both are great tractors and similar in size. I looked hard at the MX two years ago.
L4701 vx. MX4800
- Thread starter coolbrze
- Start date
- Views: 37005
-
- Tags
- kubota mx4800
jeff9366
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2011
- Messages
- 12,777
- Tractor
- Kubota Tractor Loader L3560 HST+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3,700 pounds bare tractor, 5,400 pounds operating weight, 37 horsepower
I watched that video. Nothing on the L4701.
I continue to SPECULATE the L4060/4760/5060/5460/6060, the MX series and probably the L4701 use one chassis/frame. The Three Point Hitch, which Neal dwells on in Messick's video, is just 'kit'. The L4060/4760/5060/5460/6060 and MX series share the same engine block and perhaps other engine components.
Sometimes the objective of marketing is to illuminate, sometimes to obfuscate. Videos no exception.
I was in marketing for 37 years.
Perhaps a contributor owning both an L4701 and an MX will illuminate.
I continue to SPECULATE the L4060/4760/5060/5460/6060, the MX series and probably the L4701 use one chassis/frame. The Three Point Hitch, which Neal dwells on in Messick's video, is just 'kit'. The L4060/4760/5060/5460/6060 and MX series share the same engine block and perhaps other engine components.
Sometimes the objective of marketing is to illuminate, sometimes to obfuscate. Videos no exception.
I was in marketing for 37 years.
Perhaps a contributor owning both an L4701 and an MX will illuminate.
Last edited:
majorwager
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2017
- Messages
- 1,062
- Location
- western new york
- Tractor
- kubota mx 5100 IH 484 ford 1620 lull 844b
Jeff, based on your deductions, your are still enveloped in marketing, a profession more akin to carnaval antics while devoid of the facts. The L series employes an entirely different rear axle housing/assembly, derived from the M series. There are no frames/chassis incorporated in compact tractors. The Messick's video, produced by a knowledgeable and respected kubota dealer, clearly disputes your premise. A position that evolves w/ each subsequent post. Some folks just thrive on argument, can't reason w/ the unreasonable.
Continuation is pointless, readers will simply agree with Messick's video conclusions or form their own opinion.
Continuation is pointless, readers will simply agree with Messick's video conclusions or form their own opinion.
Last edited:
jeff9366
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2011
- Messages
- 12,777
- Tractor
- Kubota Tractor Loader L3560 HST+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3,700 pounds bare tractor, 5,400 pounds operating weight, 37 horsepower
My SPECULATION about shared components has been opined on T-B-N for years. Nothing new, nothing evolving about my SPECULATIONS except additional SPECULATION, inspired by this thread, that L4701 may share frame/chassis with other Kubota models.
I do not own any Kubota stock. I have no involvement with any Kubota dealer, other than as a customer. I own a Kubota L3560, which does not share frame/chassis nor engine block with L4060/4760/5060/5460/6060 nor MX.
I am not making claims, I am SPECULATING.
The strength of T-B-N is in the diversity of thought provoking opinions expressed. The OP will decide what information is valuable to the OP.
Last edited:
Oldoak
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
- Messages
- 1,817
- Tractor
- Kubota L5060GST, J D X758 GT, J D 855D XUV
No dog in this fight either, however, since this thread has turned argumentative........... I always believe false or misleading information is worse than no information at all, not matter what the subject matter. Opinions and speculation is just that, not necessarily factual.
Who is right or wrong, I wouldn't know, other than Messick's very informative video, which I would consider the higher authority on Kubota tractors.
Who is right or wrong, I wouldn't know, other than Messick's very informative video, which I would consider the higher authority on Kubota tractors.
majorwager
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2017
- Messages
- 1,062
- Location
- western new york
- Tractor
- kubota mx 5100 IH 484 ford 1620 lull 844b
Oldoak, your comment is appreciated. Generally believe, as you apparently do, Messick's is an authoritative and reputable source for valid information. Each of us have opinions to share, some helpful, some not so much. Deliberate speculation designed to deceive and or mislead, without basis in fact, and the intrinsic value of said speculation, is summarily described in you post..
goeduck
Super Member
No dog in the fight either but when MXs first came out I thought the were a hybrid between an L front and an M rear. Hence Mcross or MX. See attached link at minute 7:14
Kubota Grand L Series VS. Kubota MX Series - YouTube
Kubota Grand L Series VS. Kubota MX Series - YouTube
Newby first timer
Silver Member
First off
I have never owned a Tractor
I was looking for a Tractor for more Utility work and not a Giant Lawn Mower.
In fact No Lawn Mowing at all.
I need a good Backhoe and a versatile front bucket that will lift what ever ( do not now specifics just anything that comes up)
I talked to my local dealer and the Sale Lady Michelle was very knowledgeable about what she was selling.
I asked her about the L4701 and the MX4800 that she had on the lot.
Again my prime objective is Utility use.
she explained a little of the differences between the models and I chose the MX4800
Specs.
L4701
Basic Wt. no extra's 3307
Bucket Cap. at Pivot 1684Lbs.
Backhoe BH92 same as the MX
MX4800
Basic Wt.3729
Bucket Cap. at Pivot2275
Backhoe BH92 same as L4701
I ordered the MX4800 and 2 weeks later I Upgraded my order to the MX5800
with a 20% power upgrade from 49.3 HP to 61.4. and a 20% power upgrade at the PTO from 39 HP to 50.2
That upgrade cost me $2000.
Michelle made it happen
For me I wanted the extra Wt. and I wanted the extra power over the L4701.
I have never owned a Tractor
I was looking for a Tractor for more Utility work and not a Giant Lawn Mower.
In fact No Lawn Mowing at all.
I need a good Backhoe and a versatile front bucket that will lift what ever ( do not now specifics just anything that comes up)
I talked to my local dealer and the Sale Lady Michelle was very knowledgeable about what she was selling.
I asked her about the L4701 and the MX4800 that she had on the lot.
Again my prime objective is Utility use.
she explained a little of the differences between the models and I chose the MX4800
Specs.
L4701
Basic Wt. no extra's 3307
Bucket Cap. at Pivot 1684Lbs.
Backhoe BH92 same as the MX
MX4800
Basic Wt.3729
Bucket Cap. at Pivot2275
Backhoe BH92 same as L4701
I ordered the MX4800 and 2 weeks later I Upgraded my order to the MX5800
with a 20% power upgrade from 49.3 HP to 61.4. and a 20% power upgrade at the PTO from 39 HP to 50.2
That upgrade cost me $2000.
Michelle made it happen
For me I wanted the extra Wt. and I wanted the extra power over the L4701.
LD1
Epic Contributor
MX4800 vs MX5800 for only $2k more......thats a no brainer to me. I figured the cost difference would be greater
