gsganzer
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2003
- Messages
- 3,200
- Location
- Denton, TX
- Tractor
- L3800 w/FEL and BH77, BX 2200 w/FEL and MMM
That is certainly an option, but many people do not have the discipline to invest that difference in premium. Also whole life is for your WHOLE life. If you outlive your term insurance, and will wind up with nothing when it expires. No money, and no way to buy any more insurance, because now you are old and sick. This is why he needs to find an agent he trusts to explain and show illustrations of how the money goes in and grows. Sure you can put your difference of premium between the two products in the stock market if that is what you want to do. Different strokes for different folks. I agree there is no free lunch, and I do like to eat.![]()
I tend to agree with travelover, if a person has some financial discipline. I don't want to confuse investments with insurance and prefer to keep them separate. Term life is the same as buying auto insurance, you buy it for an intended purpose and a specific term and it's significantly cheaper than whole life. The idea behind term is that it's intended to protect you during the period of your life that your family would be at financial risk if you croaked. By the time you hit 65, your home should be paid for, kids through college and spouse ready to start tapping the IRA and 401K's.
However, if someone had the spare cash and wanted to buy whole life, a great way to do it is to take your cash and buy CD's in different terms. Then use the proceeds from the maturing CD's to pay the whole life premiums. In the long run, you'd buy the whole life policy for significantly cheaper.