CurlyDave
Elite Member
While I worked for a company I had term life and always paid the extra to bring it to 5 times salary.
Didn't ever have any whole life, because I put money into a 401(k). There is no need for a separate policy with a residual value if I have retirement savings, since if I die I don't need any retirement income. DW worked and did the same.
Now that we are retired, we have no life insurance, but our 401(k)s have been converted to IRAs. There is enough there to take care of either of us.
To me, having no mortgages and no money in stocks is a grave financial error, even in retirement. The certainty that money will be eaten away by inflation is a much greater problem than any risk associated with stocks or mortgaged investment property.
Didn't ever have any whole life, because I put money into a 401(k). There is no need for a separate policy with a residual value if I have retirement savings, since if I die I don't need any retirement income. DW worked and did the same.
Now that we are retired, we have no life insurance, but our 401(k)s have been converted to IRAs. There is enough there to take care of either of us.
To me, having no mortgages and no money in stocks is a grave financial error, even in retirement. The certainty that money will be eaten away by inflation is a much greater problem than any risk associated with stocks or mortgaged investment property.