schmism
Super Member
It's entirely accurate. I don't have an iPhone.![]()
Its NOT just iphones.... iphones are just the most well known example.
It's entirely accurate. I don't have an iPhone.![]()
Another problem with LoJack is the law enforcement agencies in your area need to have cars with the LoJack receivers in them and not every agency has them.
Look with police cars that have 4 18 inch antennas in a square pattern on the roof.
If they have 3 13 inch antennas in a triangle that is for the ETS Pronet bank robbery systems.
David Kb7uns
That assumes the thief is smart. Seeing as how he's already decided to steal something instead of work for it, we can generally eliminate that possibility. LoJack claims a 98% recovery rate, so we can start with the assumption that only 1 out of 50 thieves have a clue.
I get the exact same results by turning it off. Cheaper, too.![]()
It's entirely accurate. I don't have an iPhone.![]()
My phone is off when it's off. End of story. Move along, nothing to see here.
Now back to your regularly scheduled tractor discussion.
As a few of you know, turning off the phone does not remove it from the system. It can be remotely turned on, remotely have the camera turned on and all without any visible sign to the owner.