mapper
Veteran Member
Previous owners rebuilt it and all wood was milled on site... cedar and Douglas fir.
[/QUOTE]
This is the key statement, it is unlikely that either the fir or cedar were old growth, both were likely milled into boards that contained a mix of heart and sap wood. Douglas fir is not really known for decay resistance, the heart wood is a bit better than the sapwood but still should not be used for exposed applications. Damp fir is also a favorite food for carpenter ants. Cedar will fair better but only the heart wood, the sap wood will rot in just a few years.
Rebuild the framing with PT or other decay resistant material and deck it with tree or similar. Please note, composite needs to be applied according to th manufacturer specs. It will swell from absorbing moisture, not as much as wood but enough to buckle if installed tight.
[/QUOTE]
This is the key statement, it is unlikely that either the fir or cedar were old growth, both were likely milled into boards that contained a mix of heart and sap wood. Douglas fir is not really known for decay resistance, the heart wood is a bit better than the sapwood but still should not be used for exposed applications. Damp fir is also a favorite food for carpenter ants. Cedar will fair better but only the heart wood, the sap wood will rot in just a few years.
Rebuild the framing with PT or other decay resistant material and deck it with tree or similar. Please note, composite needs to be applied according to th manufacturer specs. It will swell from absorbing moisture, not as much as wood but enough to buckle if installed tight.