jyoutz
Super Member
The Federal Acquisition Regulations are national, and most states have similar laws. I have never seen a brand specified by shenanigans. Every year we end up with different brands on contract. In fact most purchasing is done nationally by GSA and local vendors fulfill the purchases by honoring the national price. I just bought 2 trucks on the GSA contract: F150, crew cab, 4x4, off road tires, for $41K. I challenge you to go buy one for anywhere close to that price. I don’t know how county and local governments do things, but my observation is things are looser in regards to acquisition requirements.Ah, but when the bids are from 3 different dealers that are selling the same brand the differences are negligible. I know the forest service in NM is the exception that proves the rule. In general, federal purchases are a boondoggle. Bids can easily be manipulated. Want to ensure you get JD equipment? Specify JD's proprietary quick attach as a bid requirement. Ditto a billion other possible requirements for billions of other things.
100% agree the dealers and/or manufacturers tend to make money on volume. Sales tax (in most states, will save the feds roughly 5-10% of what locals pay). Of course, much of the overpayment is due to the leadership of federal departments asking Congress for more money as a badge of honor and Congress acting like spending fewer dollars is an affront to their appropriation power. Unlike agencies outside of government or even in some state/local governments, federal departments have to spend their allocated budgets. This problem is apolitical as all parties are complicit in furthering this nonsense. Even if our friend in NM comes in a million under budget, the forest service as a whole will spend that savings to ensure their budget remains high and doesn't offend Congress for daring to save taxpayers.
I would love to see comparisons between costs of government purchases and the pre-tax cost of a similarly sized corporate purchase. While individuals in corporations sometimes try the same shenanigans, their budgets have constant down pressure from stockholders. Example, a boss i had in the 80s wanted Apple computers rather than corporate standard of PCs. He wrote up some BS about why some app would only work on a Mac and got it approved. A year later I was brought in to his department by his boss to obtain the proof needed to fire him. It was almost an undercover assignment.