I'm just curious. Isn't federal law involved where you can't just do as you think may be fit, on an aircraft or ship?
For vessels, the answer is yes and no, or we could say, it depends.
There are Federal regulations that must be followed for vessels used to carry paying passengers. So the answer would be yes. But, if the vessel is a private vessel then, no, many regulations do not apply.
In this case, it will be interesting to see if the superstructure on the DUCK affected stability and prevented escape from the vessel. I believe these two issues are covered by Federal regulations for commercial vessels.
Been meaning to post this summary from the NTSB:
The NTSB's initial review findings from the video are below:
- The audio quality varies widely throughout the recording, affecting the intelligibility of what is spoken.
- About 18:27:08. The captain and driver boarded the previously empty vehicle. The driver sat in the driverç—´ seat and the captain sat in the side-facing seat to the right of the driver. (The captain operates the duck on water and the driver operates duck on the road.)
[*]About 18:28:00. The crew was told to take the water portion of the tour first, by an individual who briefly stepped onto the rear of the vehicle.
- About 18:29:13. As the passengers were loading, the captain made a verbal reference to looking at the weather radar prior to the trip.
- About 18:33:10. The driver stated a passenger count of 29 and shortly after, the vehicle departed the terminal facility. The captain narrated the tour while the vehicle was in motion.
- Starting about 18:50. In the vicinity of the boat ramp, the captain began a safety briefing regarding the water portion of the tour. The briefing included the location of emergency exits as well as the location of the life jackets. The captain then demonstrated the use of a life jacket and pointed out the location of the life rings. The captain moved into the driverç—´ seat and the driver moved into the seat directly behind.
[*]About 18:55:20. The captain announced to the passengers that they would be entering the water. The boat entered the water. The water appeared calm at this time.
- Between about 18:56:22 and 19:00:38. The captain allowed four different children to sit in the driverç—´ seat, while he observed and assisted.
[*]About 19:00:25. Whitecaps rapidly appeared on the water and winds increased.
- About 19:00:42. The captain returned to the driverç—´ seat. The driver lowered both the port and starboard clear plastic side curtains.
- About 19:01:01. The captain made a comment about the storm.
- About 19:03:15. The captain made a handheld radio call, the content of which is currently unintelligible.
[*]About 19:04:15. An electronic tone associated with the bilge alarm activated.
- About 19:05:21. The captain reached downward with his right hand and the bilge alarm ceases.
- About 19:05:40. The captain made a handheld radio call, the content of which is currently unintelligible.
- In the final minutes of the recording. Water occasionally splashes inside the vehicleç—´ passenger compartment. (The low frame rate and relatively low resolution make it very difficult to be more precise in the preliminary review.)
- About 19:07:26. An electronic tone associated with the bilge alarm activated.
- 19:08:27. The inward-facing recording ended, while the vehicle was still on the surface of the water.
The key points to me is that they went into the water first, apparently because they knew there was a chance of bad weather. This is at 18:28:00. What did the captain see on radar?
The DUCK got into the water around 18:55:20. Five minutes later at 19:00:25 white caps appeared.
The bilge alarm went off four minutes later at 19:04:15 and the captain turned off the alarm. Bilge alarms are LOUD to get your attention. Turning it off would be normal. What is interesting is the the bilge alarm went off again three minutes later at 19:07:26. Was this the same alarm or a second alarm indicating the water was higher in the bilge?
However, it is only towards the end of the video that "Water occasionally splashes inside the vehicle's passenger compartment." This is after 19:05:40. Does the bilge alarm sounding before waves were seen entering the boats mean that the boat was taking on water for another reason?
The recording went off at 19:08:27 but the vessel was still on the surface. Did the crew turn off the camera or did the water get high enough into the boat to start affecting the electrical system?
One DUCK sank and one did not. Did the boat that sank simply get overwhelmed by the waves or was there a hull or equipment failure that caused the sinking?
Another question that will be answered is the number of bilge pumps and how many GPM they can pump. Where they engine powered or electric powered? What type of bilge pump? Did the bilge pumps clogged up and fail to function?
Some pumps will work with trash. Others will not. It boat sinkings, especially sailboats that have been knocked down by waver or capsized, it is not uncommon for debris like books, to clogged the bilge pumps. It would not surprise me if a/the bilge pump worked but then was stopped up due to a potato chip bag or some such. Not saying that is what happened, just that it would not surprise me.
Later,
Dan