My FEL is bleeding down

   / My FEL is bleeding down #61  
This thread has been very entertaining yet very informational, I have learned much about hydraulics.
I am going with the:
If the piston seals are bad and there are no leaks in the system (valve zero leakage,no fluid on floor) the volume of the system will be constant. Fluid cannot be compressed. Moving the piston will move the rod in or out of the system changing the volume. Cannot happen.
Team.

My backhoe outriggers constantly leak down and now I have an idea of whats going on. Thanks to all.
I'm only posting so I do't get fined.
 
   / My FEL is bleeding down #62  
My backhoe outriggers constantly leak down and now I have an idea of whats going on. Thanks to all.
I'm only posting so I do't get fined.


Not to add to the confusion, but that would be a bit different. In the case of your outriggers, you are extending the cylinder. So instead of trying to compress fluid that just cannot.....you are pulling a vacuum. And vacuum acts more like air that is compressible. Plus the higher likelyhood of pulling air into the system through the gland seal.

So to sum it up.....if a cylinder collapses (retracts) it is NOT the piston seals. But for extension, it can be.
 
   / My FEL is bleeding down #63  
Not to add to the confusion, but that would be a bit different. In the case of your outriggers, you are extending the cylinder. So instead of trying to compress fluid that just cannot.....you are pulling a vacuum. And vacuum acts more like air that is compressible. Plus the higher likelyhood of pulling air into the system through the gland seal.

So to sum it up.....if a cylinder collapses (retracts) it is NOT the piston seals. But for extension, it can be.

They drop down from storage position while backhoe is still hooked up to the remote,not sure when the hoe is removed, and the machine constantly drops while working. No fluid leaks.
 
   / My FEL is bleeding down #64  
They drop down from storage position while backhoe is still hooked up to the remote,not sure when the hoe is removed, and the machine constantly drops while working. No fluid leaks.

Any of the cylinders that are "compressing" under load is a definite that the valve is the issue. Those that are extending, could be either valve or seals.

One way to be sure is to disconnect the valve (remotes). If they quit drifting, you have your answer. If they continue to do so, you also have your answer.
 
   / My FEL is bleeding down #65  
Any of the cylinders that are "compressing" under load is a definite that the valve is the issue. Those that are extending, could be either valve or seals.

One way to be sure is to disconnect the valve (remotes). If they quit drifting, you have your answer. If they continue to do so, you also have your answer.

Agreed, backhoe is at the back of the property under a snow covered tarp. 3pt blower on board and I will enjoy giving it some exercise today. Will diagnose the outriggers in the spring. Boy do I need an out building.
Thanks.
 
   / My FEL is bleeding down
  • Thread Starter
#66  
Wow, came back to this thread after a few days and was surprised. Thanks for all the replies. I'll have to read through everything a few more times to get my head around it. LD1 has made some great points.

I'll accept that the "bleed down" can be normal. I also know that not all tractors do it, or not enough to notice. A guy down the road from me moved a smoker he is working on out to his drive the other evening and left the bucket hanging over the smoker. Next morning when I went to church, the loader is still suspended over the smoker. My loader would have been resting on the smoker.
 
Last edited:
   / My FEL is bleeding down #67  
The thread that just keeps giving.....

It seems like 1/2 the people "get it" and half the people don't.
THIS LINK might help the people in the "don't get it" camp.
I've also attached a sketch that I drew awhile back, and actually successfully brought someone over to the "get it" camp.

I still have yet to see anyone of the "don't get it" crowd explain how a 2 inch steel rod can be shoved into a cylinder full of oil without said oil coming out somewhere.

I'll happily debate it for awhile longer, but I will become bored soon with such elementary hydraulics.

Arlen, I think it might have been me that you converted awhile back, possibly in the following thread, at post #154: http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/attachments/320824-hydraulic-top-link-drawbacks-16.html I was grateful to you and dkrug back then for the education that led to my Eureka moment. :thumbsup:

What I had been missing then, and what I think several members aren't fully focusing on now in this thread despite LD1, Arlen and others saying it in several posts, is the fact that (1) we are assuming that the hydraulic cylinder being discussed is completely filled with oil (which is virtually incompressible), on both sides of the piston, and is sealed from outside leaks, and (2) whatever portion of the rod that is inside the sealed cylinder at any given time (during retraction, extension or not moving at all) must displace an equal volume of hydraulic fluid. When the rod is forced into a double-acting cylinder during retraction, an exact equivalent volume of oil has to be able to exit the cylinder, either through a port into the rest of the closed system (e.g. via a leaky spool valve to the reservoir), or out of the system altogether through a leaky rod gland seal or leaky port fitting or quick disconnect. If the oil can't escape the cylinder in some way, the rod can absolutely go no farther into the cylinder. By the same token, under the same conditions, i.e., no leaks other than past the piston seals, the rod cannot be pulled farther out of the cylinder (as when the weight of a suspended implement or attachment is trying to pull the cylinder into extension). It is not enough that the oil can move past the piston itself from one end of the cylinder to the other via a leaky or non-existent piston seal. Where the weight of the implement or attachment (like the OP's FEL) is pulling on the rod for long periods of time and there is a leak in the piston seals, extension can indeed occur without oil leaving the cylinder, but in the absence of a leaky spool valve, that is logically due to air leaking in past the gland seal to fill the void created within the cylinder as part of the rod gradually exits and pulls a vacuum. Of course, once air is inside the cylinder, it can be compressed, unlike oil.


The syringe example that a poster gave is a very different situation. The rod of the plunger ("piston") of a syringe does not have a gland seal, as the syringe is open to the air at the top. So if the piston seal leaks as it is compressed, the water or other fluid can easily flow around the piston to the top of the syringe. Only if we added a gland seal to the syringe, and then filled the syringe completely with fluid on both sides of the plunger (i.e., no air whatever, which is compressible) would we simulate what happens in a hydraulic cylinder with no external leaks. The example someone else gave of a ball bearing in a sealed, oil-filled tube being able to roll back and forth is even more inapposite. There, there is no rod attached to the ball bearing "piston". So there is no structural part of the device trying to move into or out of the closed cylinder that could displace any of the oil.

The posts in this thread by J_J have caused me to expend the most brain power rethinking all of this because of J_J's encyclopedic knowledge of tractor hydraulics evidenced in many other threads I've seen that he's contributed to. Where I come out on this is that, while I don't doubt for a moment what he and others have observed in actual practice in terms of "cylinder leak down" and remediation, I have to believe that there is leakage somewhere else in those instances beyond simple movement of oil past the piston seals from one end of the cylinder to the other. To me the principle that LD1 and Arlen are presenting here is as irrefutable as the basic principle in physics that speed = distance/time. Well, yes, Einstein did show that even that isn't as simple as everyone once thought. :laughing:

I haven't said anything in this post that hasn't been said earlier in this thread, but maybe stating it this way will help somebody. It's the thought process that brought me into the believers' camp. :)
 
   / My FEL is bleeding down #68  
Arlen, I think it might have been me that you converted awhile back, possibly in the following thread, at post #154: http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/attachments/320824-hydraulic-top-link-drawbacks-16.html I was grateful to you and dkrug back then for the education that led to my Eureka moment. :thumbsup:

What I had been missing then, and what I think several members aren't fully focusing on now in this thread despite LD1, Arlen and others saying it in several posts, is the fact that (1) we are assuming that the hydraulic cylinder being discussed is completely filled with oil (which is virtually incompressible), on both sides of the piston, and is sealed from outside leaks, and (2) whatever portion of the rod that is inside the sealed cylinder at any given time (during retraction, extension or not moving at all) must displace an equal volume of hydraulic fluid. When the rod is forced into a double-acting cylinder during retraction, an exact equivalent volume of oil has to be able to exit the cylinder, either through a port into the rest of the closed system (e.g. via a leaky spool valve to the reservoir), or out of the system altogether through a leaky rod gland seal or leaky port fitting or quick disconnect. If the oil can't escape the cylinder in some way, the rod can absolutely go no farther into the cylinder. By the same token, under the same conditions, i.e., no leaks other than past the piston seals, the rod cannot be pulled farther out of the cylinder (as when the weight of a suspended implement or attachment is trying to pull the cylinder into extension). It is not enough that the oil can move past the piston itself from one end of the cylinder to the other via a leaky or non-existent piston seal. Where the weight of the implement or attachment (like the OP's FEL) is pulling on the rod for long periods of time and there is a leak in the piston seals, extension can indeed occur without oil leaving the cylinder, but in the absence of a leaky spool valve, that is logically due to air leaking in past the gland seal to fill the void created within the cylinder as part of the rod gradually exits and pulls a vacuum. Of course, once air is inside the cylinder, it can be compressed, unlike oil.


The syringe example that a poster gave is a very different situation. The rod of the plunger ("piston") of a syringe does not have a gland seal, as the syringe is open to the air at the top. So if the piston seal leaks as it is compressed, the water or other fluid can easily flow around the piston to the top of the syringe. Only if we added a gland seal to the syringe, and then filled the syringe completely with fluid on both sides of the plunger (i.e., no air whatever, which is compressible) would we simulate what happens in a hydraulic cylinder with no external leaks. The example someone else gave of a ball bearing in a sealed, oil-filled tube being able to roll back and forth is even more inapposite. There, there is no rod attached to the ball bearing "piston". So there is no structural part of the device trying to move into or out of the closed cylinder that could displace any of the oil.

The posts in this thread by J_J have caused me to expend the most brain power rethinking all of this because of J_J's encyclopedic knowledge of tractor hydraulics evidenced in many other threads I've seen that he's contributed to. Where I come out on this is that, while I don't doubt for a moment what he and others have observed in actual practice in terms of "cylinder leak down" and remediation, I have to believe that there is leakage somewhere else in those instances beyond simple movement of oil past the piston seals from one end of the cylinder to the other. To me the principle that LD1 and Arlen are presenting here is as irrefutable as the basic principle in physics that speed = distance/time. Well, yes, Einstein did show that even that isn't as simple as everyone once thought. :laughing:

I haven't said anything in this post that hasn't been said earlier in this thread, but maybe stating it this way will help somebody. It's the thought process that brought me into the believers' camp. :)

Now MY brain hurts;)
 
   / My FEL is bleeding down #70  
No relief valve between the loader and valve
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

Wolverine Quick Attach Skid Steer Rock Rake (A50514)
Wolverine Quick...
2018 FREIGHTLINER 108SD DUMP TRUCK (A51406)
2018 FREIGHTLINER...
2013 Ford F-550 4x4 Ext. Cab Auto Crane 6406H 6,000LB Crane Service Truck (A50323)
2013 Ford F-550...
2015 Kubota MX5200F 55HP Loader Utility Tractor (A51691)
2015 Kubota...
2006 INTERNATIONAL 7600 T/A DUMP TRUCK (A51406)
2006 INTERNATIONAL...
CATERPILLAR 259D SKID STEER (A51242)
CATERPILLAR 259D...
 
Top