New 4310
- Thread starter load
- Start date
- Views: 2271
rockyridgefarm
Elite Member
Great looking setup you "had" there (before it was confiscated...)
<font color="green"> </font> If that farmer from rockyridge comes asking questions, just tell him you already gave your club dues to me..hehehe
Texicans... /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
<font color="green"> </font> If that farmer from rockyridge comes asking questions, just tell him you already gave your club dues to me..hehehe
Texicans... /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
Tractors4u
Elite Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2002
- Messages
- 2,540
- Location
- Athens Alabama
- Tractor
- Deere 4310, Kubota L355, John Deere SST18 Spin Steer, 2006 Polaris Ranger
Load welcome to Club 4310. And not only are you a member of this highly respected organization you are part of a very small sub-culture of Club 4310, yes you guessed it, The ePowrReverser Club of America. I was beginning to think I was the only member.
_RaT_
Super Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2000
- Messages
- 5,813
- Location
- Peoples Republic of Northern CA.
- Tractor
- Kioti 3510-SE HST
Well that explains it! Kudos to you for the job you do or did. Enjoy your tractor, it will be a real asset. The pictures you have taken are great, thanks. Rat (from the German name Ratermann)
JDgreen227
Super Member
loud,
I saw your earlier post where you called the 4210 underpowered for it's size in comparison to the 4115. In the year I've had my 4210 I have only used full throttle one time, to drag a 3000 lb. slab of reinforced concrete. I will concur that the 4115 has a better power to weight ratio and if you are going to use a tractor for mowing purposes I'd go with the 4115, but if you do a lot of loader work the medium frame 4210/4310 will be better. One of the reasons I upsized my JD from a 4115 was because I wanted a tractor strong enough to move our 6000 lb. travel trailer around the property and move heavy logs and rocks without breaking something. As 90 % of my operating hours are mowing time I chose the 4210 as a compromise between the 4115/4310, for me it's ideal. Just my opinion....
I saw your earlier post where you called the 4210 underpowered for it's size in comparison to the 4115. In the year I've had my 4210 I have only used full throttle one time, to drag a 3000 lb. slab of reinforced concrete. I will concur that the 4115 has a better power to weight ratio and if you are going to use a tractor for mowing purposes I'd go with the 4115, but if you do a lot of loader work the medium frame 4210/4310 will be better. One of the reasons I upsized my JD from a 4115 was because I wanted a tractor strong enough to move our 6000 lb. travel trailer around the property and move heavy logs and rocks without breaking something. As 90 % of my operating hours are mowing time I chose the 4210 as a compromise between the 4115/4310, for me it's ideal. Just my opinion....
Sorry JDgreen227, but you got the wrong guy. I'm not loud, I'm load . I have no opinion one way or the other between the 4210 and the 4115. I bought the 4310 because it seemed it would suit my needs, it was at a great dealer in stock, and I felt like I was getting a decent deal. As for throttle settings, it's been my experience when running hydraulics, it's best to run the throttle at higher speed to run the hydraulic pump at it's optimal RPM. I use the transmission to set my speed and tend to keep the throttle up. Thanks for your reply and I hope you enjoy your green as much as I do mine. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
bigblock
Silver Member
Brent, you're not the only one. I also have the reverser. I think it's great. I don't knock anyone for having a hydro but I'm very happy with the reverser.
Load, congrats on the new machine. I love mine and I hope that you are just as happy with yours.
Bob
Load, congrats on the new machine. I love mine and I hope that you are just as happy with yours.
Bob
