New cabbed 4320

[Sharp Ranches]

Sharp,

I'm not trying to hijack the thread, but can you please compare the 4320 to the 5083? I currently have a OS 4320 and I am debating between a 4520 cab and 5083 cab. My only concern with the 5083 is the ability to tow it compared to the 4520 cab. I use a 24' 14k gooseneck behind a chevy 2500 diesel.

Just saw your request for info concerning hauling the 5083. My 5083 equipped with FEL and loaded rears weighs in at about 12,000 lbs. I haul it with a 25' gooseneck rated at 22,500 lbs GVWR. I think you would be OK if your trailer can handle the load plus the trailer weight so as to not exceed the rated GVWR. My previous flatbed (used for the JD 4320) was only rated at 10k GVWR and would not handle the 5083's load weight.

 

[Rockgod]

Update,

I took deliverly about 3 weeks ago. MOST everythig has been great, put about 17 hours on it so far and am very pleased!

More on the "MOST" part later..

 

[Rockgod]

Couple more

 

[Johndeere3720]

Nice! :thumbsup::drool:

 

[PioneerMan]

So what's the 'most' about? I am getting one much like that in a few weeks... Looks awesome!

 

[rekees4300]

Update,

I took deliverly about 3 weeks ago. MOST everythig has been great, put about 17 hours on it so far and am very pleased!

More on the "MOST" part later..

Awesome! You might consider a ballast box, loaded rear tires and/or some other rear attachment to provide weight to offset the FEL.

 

[Rockgod]

So what's the 'most' about? I am getting one much like that in a few weeks... Looks awesome!

Had problems with the JD SSQA didn't fit right.

I started a new thread (ATI Tach-All) on the direction I went. You can retain the JD QA and still use Skid steer implements with ease

Much better fit and finish too imo :thumbsup:

http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/attachments/217859-atis-jd-tach-all.html

 

[om21braz]

That is one fine tractor you have there. Glad you got the minor kinks worked out.

 

[Rockgod]

Awesome! You might consider a ballast box, loaded rear tires and/or some other rear attachment to provide weight to offset the FEL.

You're right about the BB, and I do have one. The photo above was just a test on the grapple, anything heavier and the BB would be on.

 

[jenkinsph]

Rockgod,
Nice set up like the grapple too.:thumbsup:

 

[PioneerMan]

Looking great!

Are you happy with the power? I will not do much heavy pto work so the lower fuel burn works better for me.

Also, some say go CX all the way, but the one I got is not the upgraded loader. I am ok with it, but what influenced your decision?

Thanks, happy tractoring.

 

[Rockgod]

Rockgod,
Nice set up like the grapple too.:thumbsup:

Thanks Steve!

Looking great!

Are you happy with the power? I will not do much heavy pto work so the lower fuel burn works better for me.

Also, some say go CX all the way, but the one I got is not the upgraded loader. I am ok with it, but what influenced your decision?

Thanks, happy tractoring.

Very happy with the power, it has exceeded my expectations.

As far as the X VS CX goes, I never really considered the CX, for my needs the 400X seemed like it had more than enough lift capacity :thumbsup:

 

[Sparkhead]

Hey Rock,

How's everything going with the 4320? Any problems with the electric 3rd function on the FEL? Mine gets delivered next week, can't wait.