SABULA FARMER said:
Earlier I was on a tractor forum, I don't recall the name of it. Anyway, they were discussing the Mahindra line of tractors. From the things said I believe that they must own stock in John Deere or Kubota. Basically I don't care what tractor a person owns, and to be honest I don't care if they want to slam the brand I own...but I just don't get the concept of slamming another brand that you don't know anything about.
It just goes to show that word of mouth is a powerful thing. I wonder how many people were looking at the Mahindras and decided against buying one because of some negative thing they heard from someone who did not know what he was talking about to begin with.
All I can say is I saved thousands of dollars and I get the job done just as fast as the Deere and Kubota owners. I never knew that John Deere and Kubotas never brake down....did you?
I own a very capable 2006 Mahindra 7520 4WD. I have owned it since April and have 174 hrs on it. I also own 2 Kubotas and a JD that range from 6 to 45 yrs of use with accumulated hrs ranging from 1500 to 3000. The JD has worn out a water pump and a clutch. One Kubota w/loader has worn out a clutch, the other failed a water pump at moderate hrs. The Mahindra has exhibited electrical malfunctions and mechanical breakdowns. These have so far cost me 5 weeks of its use. Three weeks ago the engine clattered and stopped while I was running the wood
chipper. It turned out the cam had stopped turning. An assembly error resulted in the key being displaced and finally the gear just spun. I am confident that Mahindra will stand behind their product. Nevertheless, these problems that pop up here and there - and now have penetrated to the heart of the tractor - are eroding my faith in a tractor that I (almost) universally find quite suitable. At the most simplistic, this is costing time out of my life that cannot be replaced. The problems are so far happening at a mechanical age, frequency, and degree that I have not experienced with my other tractors. The premature conclusion of lesser reliability is difficult not to jump to. I am hoping problems will cease to spring forth. It is becoming harder to trust that they will. In making this post it troubles me that I have perceived a tendency in this forum to dis a poster who has something to say that might in some way reflect badly on a brand. I know that my experience fits into that category. Still, I cannot discount it, nor believe it valueless to others.
I have one major dissatisfaction with the tractor that does not appear to have anything to do with a malfunction, but I am querying Mahindra and pursuing that as a possibility. Slow hydraulics. The 20 Series Brochure lists for the 7520:
Steering
Type - Hydrostatic Power & tilt steering
Hydraulic System
Type - Open center, full live hydraulic, with position and draft controls
The brochure lists 5GPM and 11.4GPM respectively for the 6520.
I test drove a 6520, and its slow loader convinced me that the 7520 was the way to go, particularly since 17GPM is enuf in a pinch for skid steer implements. Imagine the disappointment on getting my tractor and finding it equally slow. Loader cycle time indicates 11 or 12 GPM. While it is in the shop I will press for remedy.
There is plenty on the good side - it just has to meet spec and keep working so you can maintain focus in that direction.
larry