BrokeFarmerJohn
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2016
- Messages
- 2,233
- Location
- Columbus Ohio
- Tractor
- 2017 Mahindra 5555, John Blue G-1000, Massey Ferguson 98, John Deere GP
A few more bits of info, on a grade with a load run 4x4, if you run 2x4 and the rear comes off the ground you will be going for a ride, in 2wd all your breaking is in the rear.
I read also that a ballast on the rear is more effective than filled tires because of the weight distribution. If I understood correctly, weight on the axel squats the tires, makes them balloon more which gives more surface area AKA more traction, with rear filled tires they don't squat really because the weight is supported on the rim not the tire, something along those lines, some more research is deff needed there.
As for filling rears, I think JD calls for 45% filled is optimal, 75% filled is a industry standard. At 45% filled the chances of rusting the rims are greatly improved ext ext. liquid ballast can also torq and push the tractor in situations, I would think greater with 45% filled.
I read also that a ballast on the rear is more effective than filled tires because of the weight distribution. If I understood correctly, weight on the axel squats the tires, makes them balloon more which gives more surface area AKA more traction, with rear filled tires they don't squat really because the weight is supported on the rim not the tire, something along those lines, some more research is deff needed there.
As for filling rears, I think JD calls for 45% filled is optimal, 75% filled is a industry standard. At 45% filled the chances of rusting the rims are greatly improved ext ext. liquid ballast can also torq and push the tractor in situations, I would think greater with 45% filled.