Not using all my horses by design??

   / Not using all my horses by design?? #1  

Atypical_decorum

Silver Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Messages
229
Location
NYC
Tractor
Ultra-Wide B7500 & looking for a 100hp
I've recent acquired a good amount of acres, but they're all steep. I have a small tractor, but it's not even close to cutting it on the hills while working (20hp). I need something bigger like an M7060 or L6060 but found a cheap Kubota M108s low profile 8 speed with 1300hrs. Of course, the horse power is way more than I need. Im going to be using a tiller, BH100 backhoe, FEL, and other equipment.

I won't be using all the HP, so I won't been to be hard into pedal. So here's the question. Does it make sense, fuel wise, to get the tractor seeing as I won't be deep into the power band to run and do what I'm looking to do? Particularly with it being 8spd.

I've looked up M7060 and they can easily get to 5+ gph full bore. An M9000 is 5 to 10gph depending on who you ask at full throttle. If this tractor is 10gph at idle it might not be worth it...but I don't know.

(edited for clarity)
 
Last edited:
   / Not using all my horses by design?? #2  
Are all Kubotas that bad on fuel? My 100 HP JD is about 2.3 gph at around 65% load. That really seems high to me.
 
   / Not using all my horses by design?? #3  
I’ve never seen my m4-071 (deluxe 7060 basically) go even close to 4, mowing I’m usually 3.4-3.6. Who is saying 5?

I don’t know what a reasonable price on the M6 is but my only hesitation would be DEF. I want a M5 badly, I could use a few more HP baling on hilly terrain.
 
   / Not using all my horses by design??
  • Thread Starter
#4  
Are all Kubotas that bad on fuel? My 100 HP JD is about 2.3 gph at around 65% load. That really seems high to me.
They aren't kind with fuel from reports. My B7500 is about 0.5GPH while mowing.
 
   / Not using all my horses by design??
  • Thread Starter
#5  
I’ve never seen my m4-071 (deluxe 7060 basically) go even close to 4, mowing I’m usually 3.4-3.6. Who is saying 5?

I don’t know what a reasonable price on the M6 is but my only hesitation would be DEF. I want a M5 badly, I could use a few more HP baling on hilly terrain.
Other posts on here is what I've seen reported.
 
   / Not using all my horses by design??
  • Thread Starter
#7  
I’ve never seen my m4-071 (deluxe 7060 basically) go even close to 4, mowing I’m usually 3.4-3.6. Who is saying 5?

I don’t know what a reasonable price on the M6 is but my only hesitation would be DEF. I want a M5 badly, I could use a few more HP baling on hilly terrain.
It's $20k. No DEF.
 
   / Not using all my horses by design?? #8  
I'm averaging 1-2 gal an hour mowing moderate hills in the MX5200 with loaded tires. It stands to reason you are better off having a little more HP than needed vs running the dog poop out of a barely enough power unit when it comes to wear and tear and machine longevity. I usually don't need 50+ hp. My 7' flail mower calls for 35hp at the PTO. But I need 50+ and more when I sink the rippers into this clay soil.
Go big or go home sorta applies within reason
 
   / Not using all my horses by design?? #9  
My Kubota L5460 (54 hp) uses about 0.7 gallons per hour flail mowing at 540 rpm, the L4760 a little less. The flail doesn’t work the engine very hard like the bush hog.
 
   / Not using all my horses by design?? #10  
I've never kept track of fuel usage but a bigger horsepower tractor will typically use less fuel because the motor isn't being run hard at rated rpm than a smaller one that is. Fuel usage isn't something I get concerned with anyway.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2017 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 4x4 High Country Crew Cab Pickup Truck (A46684)
2017 Chevrolet...
(6) Front Tractor Weights (A46502)
(6) Front Tractor...
2012 John Deere 7280R MFWD Tractor (A48561)
2012 John Deere...
3040 (A49339)
3040 (A49339)
2015 KENWORTH T370 QUINT AXLE DUMP TRUCK (A45678)
2015 KENWORTH T370...
KC 28in.x90in. Metal V Bottom Feed Bunk (A49339)
KC 28in.x90in...
 
Top