Bytesmiths
New member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2007
- Messages
- 7
- Tractor
- Ford 1700
MikePA said:See Paul Ehrlich's population bomb predictions from the 70s. Every generation has it's own Chicken Little.
70s - Population Explosion, we'll never be able to feed everyone, then it was the coming ice age, now it's global warming.
Have you even read his books? I have. He said NOTHING about ice ages. And his population predictions were based on population rates and commodity consumption rates of the mid-century. He devotes a whole chapter to what could be done, and an amazing number of the things he recommends were actually implemented in the 80's.
Had US petroleum production not peaked in 1970, and had OPEC not embargoed oil in the late 70's, Ehrlich's predictions may well have come true. The oil shocks of the 70's caused "demand destruction," which gave us all a couple more decades breathing room. Ehrlich (and Malthus, for that matter) wasn't so much wrong as he was early.
Fossil energy directly supports our population today. When it goes into decline, whether by tomorrow (many researchers claim we're already past the peak) or by the most optimistic guesses (USGS says 2032), population will have to decline if that energy is not replaced.
The "green revolution" in agriculture should really be called a "black revolution," as in black gold: petroleum and natgas. When natural gas peaks and declines, where will the fertilizer come from? North America is very near peak, and NIMBY is making it impossible to site LNG ship terminals so we can use up the rest of the world's gas. (That's A Good Thing.
If the number of lilies in a pond doubles every day, and on the 29th day, the pond is half-full, how many days will it take to fill the pond with lilies? We're in the 29th day here, and everyone's looking around and saying, "Why, there's PLENTY of pond left!"