Pixguy
Elite Member
Well said.
Agreed as well.
I would have been put on Ritalin if I was a kid today. Glad I'm not.
Well said.
Just remember very smart is as abnormal as dumb dumb. High energy doesn't = smart. HSHigh energy people can be bi-polar people as well, big ideas, get a lot done, and fade as their natural rhythms shift. Not every high energy person is ADHD. Like saying that Einstein had a learning disability, or the latest - that Einstein was autistic because he was smart (meant he was a geek and geeks are autistic). Society never knows what to do with its members who are different. Live and let live is my approach.
I concur to a limited extent. :laughing:
I don't doubt that we are more aware of and discerning of various conditions than in the past, and we have some treatments now that did not exist back when.
In parallel with that we are also experiencing a vastly different environment than in the past. Hundreds (thousands?) of man-made chemicals are present in the environment now that did not exist earlier. We also have air and water pollutants, and pollutant levels, that are unique to the current age. We ingest these pollutants directly and take them in via food as residues. We are what we eat--literally--and the veggies, fruits and meats that we eat are also what they "eat."
I would not discount that change and assume it has no effect. That would be a relative miracle if that were true.
Given the number and combinations of environmental factors, there is more to study, understand and learn than we have the capacity to do, really. Talent, time and resources are not up to the job. Given that some of those things are wasted on "studies" with predetermined agenda-driven results, makes it even worse since that forces the burning of resources to refute the propaganda.
The research done over the past several years on honeybee colony collapse is a good example of the difficulty in sorting out all those potential causal factors. The latest research shows neonicotinoids do not directly kill bees, it just makes them learning impaired to the point that it impacts the colony survival.
Researchers confirm that neonicotinoid insecticides impair bee's brains
We surely do not know if similar things are happening--or not--in humans.
Re autism, latest connection being studied is that glysophate residue is interacting with the body to increase aluminum (a neuro-toxin) uptake.
Autism Explained: Synergistic Poisoning from Aluminum and Glyphosate - Stephanie Seneff
Autism Explained: Synergistic Poisoning from Aluminum and Glyphosate - Stephanie Seneff | autismone.org
Aluminum exposure is one of the markers for Alzheimers as well.
The Round up and Monsanto folks say this is bogus - follow the dollar.
......Unless we solve this one, the bulk of the population being born will be on the spectrum.
Remember Stephanie Seneff? When last Orac discussed her, she had been caught dumpster diving into the VAERS database in order to torture the data to make it confess a link between aluminum adjuvants in vaccines and acetaminophen and you guessed it autism. It was a bad paper in a bad journal known as Entropy that I deconstructed in detail around two years ago. As I said at the time, I hadn't seen a review article that long and that badly done since the even more horrible article by Helen Ratajczak entitled Theoretical aspects of autism: Causes: a review (which, not surprisingly, was cited approvingly by Seneff et al). Seneff, it turns out, is an MIT scientist, but she is not a scientist with any expertise in autism, epidemiology, or, for that matter, any relevant scientific discipline that would give her the background knowledge and skill set to take on analyzing the epidemiological literature regarding autism. Indeed, she is in the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at MIT. ......
So what we have here is a computer scientist interested in artificial intelligence who thinks she can switch her expertise to medicine, biology, and epidemiology. Let's just put it this way. An undergraduate degree in biophysics in 1968 does not qualify one to do this sort of research, and, as I discussed in her foray into autism and vaccine epidemiology, it really does show. Badly. The paper was so embarrassingly incompetent that I'm surprised any journal was willing to publish it.......
The bottom line is that the crank magnetism is strong in Dr. Seneff. She's antivaccine and anti-GMO. She is full of Dunning-Kruger, thinking that she can transfer her computer science and artificial intelligence knowledge to knowledge of epidemiology, biochemistry, and medicine. She can't.
Oh, no! GMOs are going to make everyone autistic! – Respectful Insolence