<font color=blue>I could go on....but hey whats the point ?</font color=blue>
well ... the point is to get all the information, feelings, misinformation, intuition and everything else out of the table so that we can understand each other. I feel like you do ... that it's extremely unlikely that I will convince you to chance your stance one iota .... but, since you have been polite enough to avoid personal attacks (thank you), I am willing to continue yto communicate.
I'm sorry, like you, I'm unable to provide absolute proof at this time. I have never really cared enough about the facts of the "bad tires" to have done more than read the papers and watch the news ... and my concern has been more along the lines of "more money grubbing lawyers" than anything else.
Marbles? Well, I'm sure if I do a search of Lexus/Nexus or any other valid database, I could dig out some of the stories, but I will just tell you that this specifc thing was related to me by my best friends brother ... who is a Chrysler union worker ... some years ago. He thought it was funny (we were sitting around drinking), and confided that they commonly did this to "teach the company a lesson" when they were upset. In his view it was harmless (just annoying to the customer) but would cost the company money to do a warranty repair.
Somehow I get the impression that you think I'm pro company and anti-union. Well, you're completely wrong on point one and completely right on point 2.
Why do I think that unions have outlived their usefulness and become a cancer?
Well ... I'm from Canada where unions are much more powerful than they are in the US. Canadian unions are akin to the British unions that have darned near destroyed all manufacturing in the UK. The auto unions in the US always wait for the CAW in Canada to do it's blackmailing before they attack the auto companies ... since it seems as though Buzz has the biggest bat in the world. Unoins in Canada don't bother trying to hassle the company ... they immediately start trying to adversely effect the public .... and the best union at those tactics are: the posties (for some reason they always pick the Christmas season to strike, wonder why) and the teachers (who strike "for the children").
<font color=blue>I can tell you I have a better job because of the threat of a union</font color=blue> sure ...we all do .... if you want to look back a century. I think it's more interesting nowadays. It's perfectly legal for a union wanting to get their foot in somewhere to send doorknockers around ... they usually look like they were too rough for the Russian Mafia ... to tell you about the benefits of joining and why you just might want to vote their way. And, at the same time, it's illegal fo rthe company to tell the workers why unionizing might be a bad thing.
Marc Rich ... sure I've heard of him ... he's a crook that was "pardoned" by another crook. You want to use him as an example of American business? Please!
I've read Ravenswood and I, personally, think it's a poorer work of fiction than Atlas Shrugged ... but at least Ayn Rand claimed her book was a novel. Sorry, having read as much as I do leads me to NOT believe everything I see in print. ****** wrote books, so did Lenin, and Mao ... and even Hillary Clinton.
<font color=blue>A union can help promote safety on a job</font color=blue> The operative word in that statement is CAN .... sure they can. Unfortunately, I have never seen a case of unions working hard for their workers safety. Currently, in the news here, we have a library workers union looking for more money; a teachers union that wants respect (spelled more money); a cops union that wants the town to pay more of the medical costs (i.e. more money), an construction unions that want the towns to only allow contractors with unionized workforces to bid on jobs. Unions don't get fined for unsafe work practices - companies do. Unless it's posturing for the newspapers, there is no value in safety. Now - benefits arising from working unsafely ... that's something they all want!
<font color=blue>average UAW worker made $60,000 last year with overtime</font color=blue> Can you point me to where you got that information? The union-friendly media here in mid-Michigan frequently make the claim that the average UAW wage (in Michigan) is $100,000 (and I'm sure overtime, if it's ever available, is included in that figure).
I keep referring to a $100k janitor and I probably should amend that to be fork truck driver, since he's the example I always think of. There was one of those "isn't this a wonderful world" articles in the paper several years ago about a gentleman in Detroit. He's nearing retirement, has a 9th grade education, and drives a fork truck at the Ford plant in (Dearborn?). For the past 3 years, he has made in excess of $100,000 each year (yes, with overtime) and lives in a simple one room aparatment ... using the money to provide scholarships to poor black youths. If you're really interested, I'm sure I could find that in Lexus/Nexas as it was reported in both the local papers we get - reprinted from the Detroit Free Press. Since I drove a fork truck - for $300 a month, when I was young, that story has managed to stick in my mind.
<font color=blue> I heard it somewhere,but if you can prove it to me </font color=blue> I'm sorry, but you see I have a real problem with that statement. We are both using "hearsay" and I'm not sure why the burdon of proof lies more on me than on you. I watched the proceedings on the whole "every tire made for the Exploder is unsafe" with interest, and the reports stated many times that the tires came from different plants, and that other tires were involved, and that it was a design flaw ... and I believe about 10% of it. If you want "proof", I would suggest that you review the files from the NHTSA archives ... all the findings are recorded online. My point was that workers made the tires ... not some CEO sitting in a posh office somewhere ... and therefore should be AT LEAST as much to blame.
Finally, let's youch on <font color=blue>There is 2 sides to every coin,that is why they say negotiate and bargain in good faith. </font color=blue>
That's one of my favorite union phrases. Have you ever noticed ... I mean really noticed ... that the union always accuses management of that ... but management is not allowed to accuse the union leaders? By the way, since you brought up a Clinton cronie as an example of businessmen ... can we also look at how many union leaders have been convicted of Mafia activities? Hey, how about that New York Transit union ... the one with the no strike clause ... that was going to strike a couple of weeks ago?
OK ... I'll get off my anti-union haywagon for now ... can you tell that I'm still annoyed about the incident back in 1977? And my wife's car (and mental scars)?
I have quite a few friends here (mostly in the Goldwing bike club) who are union (or retired union) and I think they're fine people. People usually are. Mobs are not ... and people become mobs at time.
If you want to trade proof - actual facts gleaned from respected (by both of us) sources, I'd be happy to continue.
regards
pete