I agree with you about back pressure being misunderstood, but it isn't without issues.
One minor point with respect to the first link. Toward the end the author states that changing the back pressure won't have an effect on a computer (ECM, or engine control module) controlled (e.g. Fuel Injected) engine. This isn't quite true.
The feedback for the engine comes from the oxygen sensor in the exhaust, which is down stream of the valves, but ahead of the muffler. The engine control module has been programmed on the assumption (knowledge?) that the exhaust being sampled is x seconds downstream of the combustion chamber at a given rpm. Without the back pressure, the exhaust is actually "newer" or ahead of that. At constant rpm, it won't matter, but if you suddenly open the throttle or shut it down, the lag or hysteresis will be noticeable, perhaps to the point of stalling the engine. Factory ECMs are tuned for a bunch of factors, and this lag is one of them. When you add fuel injection to a carburetored engine, you end up having to tune many of these parameters.
You might ask why I know this- I had an older car that had an exhaust system that was a little resonant, so it was probably factory tweaked, and had some amount of back pressure. At one point the muffler blew out and boy did the performance on the engine change. Try to do 0-65 on an on-ramp was like telegraphing the ships engine room. You'd stomp on the accelerator, the engine would fumble, almost die, think about life for a few seconds, and then roar to life. (It happened to me about six hours after buying the car, just outside of MR's neck of the woods at about 10:00pm at night.) Let's just say I didn't drive as far as I was planning that night, because the nearest 24 hour muffler repair shop was more than few hours away. After the muffler was fixed, it was a great car for me. I put another 200,000 miles on it, with not much in the way of service besides the usual oil changes.
All the best,
Peter