Grimreaper,
Economic theory is one thing...but life does not always follow the theory when we deal with people close to us in some way.
A good example is dealing with our kids or perhaps our siblings. If we sell something we may actually try to be fair. Won't hide the fact that there are shortcomings or negatives that should be considered, for example.
I agree with you on the economic theory side. But don't agree that it is not possible to make a fair deal with a friend/neighbor. I am not sure that is what you were saying anyway.
If two people are satisfied with a deal, that does not make the deal fair. An example might be these old ladies in Florida that go to dance schools and are conned into giving tens of thousands of dollars to their instructors. This really happens and the ladies are satisfied with the arrangement [read about this in the papers there on our first visit to Florida last January]. In reality, although happy, these elderly women have been taken advantage of big time.
In the open market, we try to get the most for the least. Our tractor shopping sprees are an example.
Back to this thread, if I paid full value for the neighbor's property, and he had the right to use it for the rest of his life, but paid the taxes and maintained it, then perhaps this could be a "fair" deal, IF the property appreciated at the same rate as the money I have him would have if I had invested it. If that were the case, then in the end I would have the same value as I would have had I just kept the money in the first place. AND he would have the same value in money as if he had kept the property in the first place. I know this example is simplistic...but it kind of makes the point.
Now if I paid the taxes, it would seem only fair that the cash put in the neighbor's hand should be quite a bit less than the actual market value. How much less? Time to get out those life espectancy tables I suppose...but then the gamble starts...as they work fine for groups of people, but not for a one person deal.
If I were willing to take the risk that property-value growth would equal investment growth, then a deal where the property owner paid the taxes for the rest of his life would be to my advantage I think. Simply because it takes a way a variable. I suppose there are ways to make sure that happens. I mean that he pays taxes every year or else...I believe he would though, without question, but you never know...
The ONLY reason I would consider doing such a thing is that we value the guarantee we would get by doing it, that is, there would be no condo or big house sitting a hundred feet from ours on the side we look out all the time.
I certainly would not consider doing this for property somewhere else...buying property, and then letting someone else use it for the cost of taxes and maintenance only, does not sound like a good business deal to me! But I guess it could be in some cases...
Like you said...or didn't say /w3tcompact/icons/blush.gif...everything is relative /w3tcompact/icons/smile.gif
Bill