Pump from Bottle Jack

/ Pump from Bottle Jack
  • Thread Starter
#21  
jbooth,

Re: the grease gun.

Can you post some more details? Do so mean to just fill the grease gun with fluid and pump away?

In my situation the output of the grease gun would be connected to a switch to a cylinder, so perhaps the gun would work in any attitude. ???

I like that idea.

ljg
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #22  
For that matter, no hand pump anything is going to move 700 pounds 3 inches in one second. That work is equivalent to 4 horsepower not counting any losses due to energy transfer. Assuming an average guy can curl 80 pounds, that's 9 pumps in a second if all of the pump ratios are perfect.

10 seconds is possible. 20-30 seconds is likely.
Good point but check your math. 700/4 ftpounds/sec is about 1/4hp I think. I think u used " vs ft.
larry
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack
  • Thread Starter
#23  
I think that validates my position. Two seconds would be 1/8 hp and about 4 pumps per second. Pretty fast, but I stated my max requirements. Less than 2 inches movement at a 200 lb. requirement would be more normal.

I may try it because the bottle jack is a closed system, basically just take the ram out, weld up the hole left and drill and tap a hole for the fitting in the inner and outer reservoir. And a clearance hole for the inner reservoir fitting.

And while the $50.00 for the Northern Tool pump is doable, $20.00 for a bottle jack and a couple of fittings is better.

By the way a bottle jack is a pump with a SA piston. There are two holes in the cast iron bottom. One opens into the inner cylinder and one opens into the outer cylinder. So the pump which is the base is basically a manifold pump.

ljg
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #25  
Mace Canute, I hear you, but using your reasoning how does a 2 ton bottle jack move 1000 lbs. 4 in. in very much less than the low time you talk about?

Since it doesn't, and I never claimed it did, what is the basis for that question?

I can easily pump a hand pump 4 times in 1 second. That's just 1/4 inch per pump. I think you are considering the mechanical advantage correctly, but don't understand the situation.

Since when does pumping a hand pump 4 times a second equate with 1/4 inch per pump? That's 1/4 second per pump, not 1/4 inch per pump.

First of all I have a handle on the pump with a pivot. Say 2 inches to 16 inches. That's an 8 x advantage right there. So with a 20 pound force on the handle I have a 160 pound input to the pump. If I move the end of the handle 16 inches I have a movement of 2 inches. So the lever itself will move 160 pounds 2 inches with 20 pounds of input.

I know that is correct.

I agree also.

I need only a 4x (4x160) advantage from the pump to get to 720 pounds force out. That drops the movement of the ram from 2 inches to 1/2 inch per pump.

I also know this is correct.

If you still have a 20 lb force acting on a 16" handle with an 8:1 mechanical advantage, that isn't correct. Just shortening the stroke of the master cylinder itself will not give you any increase in MA unless it is done by altering the fulcrum point. If you have a 20 lb force acting through a mechanical advantage of 36:1, then it is correct.


Also I don't need to have 720 lbs./sq. in of force on the piston. I need 720 pounds of weight. The size of the piston is not material. Can be 1/2 inch or 2 inches. And before you get your drawers in a knot, what the ram is pushing on is what is important. A two inch piston pushing with 720 pounds on a 1/2 inch object applies the same force on the 1/2 object as a 1/2 inch piston pushing with 720 lbs. What this amounts to is that in my calculations I can ignore volume, except as concerns the total mechanical advantage.

So all I have to be concerned with is the total mechanical advantage to any size piston out.

So the hand pump only has to pump 1/4 the volume of fluid I displace with my 1/2 inch stroke. I'm unsure here, but looks like 8 pumps with the handle will get me the desired results. More like two seconds, but remember I said, no less than 1 second and more was ok.

My math before may have been incorrect, likely was, but not now.

You did state in Post#5 "I need to move a ram about 3 inches with 500-700 lbs of force within about 1 second no faster." and "The diameter of the cylinder less than 1/2 inch perhaps."

You absolutely cannot ignore volume. Mechanical advantage is just half the equation.

You can divide up the volume over a number of pumps, but you still have to make up a finite amount of volume if you want the slave cylinder to travel 3".

I doubt a pump made from a hydraulic jack would have that amount of volume at that pressure even with a lot of modification.

A bottle jack is a hand pump with a SA piston. If a two ton bottle jack will lift 2000 lbs. 4 inches, why wouldn't it have enough volume to lift 700 lbs./3inches.???????

The jack will, but you don't want the whole jack, you want to use just the high pressure piston from the BJ. It's volume is very small, hence the very large number of strokes it takes to move the BJ ram.

My math was likely wrong.

Your math as long as it goes is correct, but the advantage of a hydraulic system lies not the in length of the handle but the the difference is volume of fluid pumped each time. A 2 ton bottle jack wouldn't work at all using your math. In addition to the mechanical advantage of the handle there is also the mechanical (fluid) advantage of pumping a large amount of fluid to move a small amount of fluid and moving the handle a large number of times to accomplish this.

ljg

The handle length make's a large difference in the mechanical advantage.
The amount of fluid pumped each time has nothing to do with MA. The amount is determined by the swept volume of piston stroke, and two pistons with the same MA can have different strokes and hence different swept volumes. It's the relative areas of the two pistons (the large ram that you see extending from the jack body and the small piston that the jack handle is connected to) that the hydraulic fluid acts upon that determines the MA there. In a bottle jack, you have two separate MA that when multiplied by each other give the total overall MA.

I think that validates my position. Two seconds would be 1/8 hp and about 4 pumps per second. Pretty fast, but I stated my max requirements. Less than 2 inches movement at a 200 lb. requirement would be more normal.

You did state in Post#5 "I need to move a ram about 3 inches with 500-700 lbs of force within about 1 second no faster." and "The diameter of the cylinder less than 1/2 inch perhaps."

I may try it because the bottle jack is a closed system, basically just take the ram out, weld up the hole left and drill and tap a hole for the fitting in the inner and outer reservoir. And a clearance hole for the inner reservoir fitting.

And while the $50.00 for the Northern Tool pump is doable, $20.00 for a bottle jack and a couple of fittings is better.

By the way a bottle jack is a pump with a SA piston. There are two holes in the cast iron bottom. One opens into the inner cylinder and one opens into the outer cylinder. So the pump which is the base is basically a manifold pump.

ljg

There is only one reservoir. That's the "outer" one. The "Inner" one is the high pressure area of the ram. They are separated by a valve that allows the oil to bypass the piston pump when it's open and allows the jack to be retracted.

All I can say now is buy your bottle jack and modify it however you want. I'm sure it will be an interesting learning experience for you. Good luck.

P.S. Don't think I am busting your chops here, it's just that I see you are under some "misconceptions" and possible lack a bit of understanding of basic hydraulics. Hopefully you will try to rectify both of those conditions and have success with your endeavor. :)
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #26  
Good point but check your math. 700/4 ftpounds/sec is about 1/4hp I think. I think u used " vs ft.
larry

I'm wrong again. Thanks for pointing it out.

I ran the numbers again and came out at about 1/3 hp.

1 hp = 550 ft. lbs./second
700 lb. over 3 inches in one second = 175 ft. lbs./second
175/550 = 0.32 hp needed.

I'm more willing to believe that a guy can do that. You go yrralguthrie!
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #27  
Mace Canute,

"I doubt a pump made from a hydraulic jack would have that amount of volume at that pressure even with a lot of modification."

A bottle jack is a hand pump with a SA piston. If a two ton bottle jack will lift 2000 lbs. 4 inches, why wouldn't it have enough volume to lift 700 lbs./3inches.

???????

How many pumps does it take you to lift 700lbs./3" with the bottle jack right now with no modifacations ? How long does it take you to do this ?

Once you know the answers you can mathmatically figure out what the cylinder/piston size needs to be. So if can can do this and post back the results we can help you .
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #28  
jbooth,

Re: the grease gun.

Can you post some more details? Do so mean to just fill the grease gun with fluid and pump away?

In my situation the output of the grease gun would be connected to a switch to a cylinder, so perhaps the gun would work in any attitude. ???

I like that idea.

ljg

You will not get much speed out of a gease gun, but you can for sure get a lot of pressure/power. The higher the pressure on the gun the less volume. I always had junk grease guns around so it was more of a convienience than any type of science. Anything thinner than grease in the gun will require the pump to be submerged (vertical) at all times or you will only pump air/lose prime.

Having a lathe, I used to make cylinders for pulling hubs from machinery and mostly just used a grease gun to power those cylinders.
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #29  
Having a lathe, I used to make cylinders for pulling hubs from machinery and mostly just used a grease gun to power those cylinders.

That is a great idea can you explain or post pictures on how you made the cylinders ? Did you just put a zerk fitting on the cylinders and just use a grease gun to fill them up ?
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #30  
That is a great idea can you explain or post pictures on how you made the cylinders ? Did you just put a zerk fitting on the cylinders and just use a grease gun to fill them up ?

The cylinders were pretty simple. Nothing but a bored/honed piece of round stock with the zerk tapped in the bottom. The piston/connection rod were just a slip fit into the bored round stock. More year ago than I like to remember, my hometown western auto sold brake cylinder cups in bulk lots. I purchased those in the truck size and didn't even bother to attach to the piston/connection rod. The cup would go in the cylinder to the bottom with the piston/connecting rod placed in behind it. After my brake cup supplier closed. I started fitting O-rings to the pistons. O-rings were harder to make leak free. No top seal arrangements were made as it was generally a one time use only. I used the button type zerks so they wouldn't slip off. We used that button type grease gun on a junk dozer. That same junk dozer was generally the reason for pulling sprockets and etc.

Sounds pretty primitive, but I bent a lot of puller strongbacks with this set up.
It would have been much simpler to just buy a good hydraulic puller, but then as today, I had more time than money.
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack
  • Thread Starter
#31  
Naysayers,

Your replies are not well thought out. You apparently just want to be negative. You may have a basic understanding of hydraulics, but you pick parts of my statements to make a point, and ignore any qualifying language.

Only one example: My qualifications were that I needed to lift 700 lbs. in MORE than 1 second. I never set a top limit, but suggested 2 seconds was also reasonable. I KNOW there is enough fluid and enough mechanical advantage in a 2 ton bottle jack to lift 700 lbs 3 inches in two seconds. Anyone that can think will also know that.

4000/666 ~ 6. 666 is close enough to 700 and I want even numbers.

If I pivot a lever at one end and place my 2 ton bottle jack under the lever at the 1 inch point. (for the **** retentive I'll substitute a knife edge for the jack anvil.) Now I'll hang a 666 lb. weight at the 7 inch point.

Result if the bottle jack moves 1/8 per each "pump" of the handle with the 666 lb. the bottle jack will then move up 1/2 inch in 4 pumps of the handle. Since the lever has a 6-1 mechanical advantage the 666 lb. weight will move 3 inches. I can easily pump that jack 4 times in 1 second. My grandmother can probably pump it 4 times in 2 seconds.

If the jack ram will only move 1/16 of an inch in one pump then I can do the job in 2 seconds.

All that hoodoo voodoo math you've been throwing at me is wrong. Maybe grounded in truth, but mistakes were made. And don't be telling me that my example is not relevant. Work is work(scientifically). If the jack will do the job with the lever it can be configured to do it mostly hydraulically. I knew it would work when I asked the question. I didn't ask if it would work, I just wanted someone to look at what I was doing to see if I left something out. Not sure I explained the situation properly as few have indicated they understood what I wanted to do. That would be my fault.
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #32  
Wow, where did the attitude come from ?, I didn't see anybody naysaying ya :confused:
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #33  
Keep in mind, yrralguthrie, that you don't need our permission to do anything. You can do whatever you want, and we just hope you're kind enough to post back on the results so we can all learn together.

We're a group of mostly amateurs trying to share experience and help others see another point of view. If you make an effort to see it from the other point of view you may see that you left something out or you may see that you were right all along. Sometimes posts here are just dead wrong like my erroneous calculations of horsepower. Other times you'll get priceless advice that will improve everything.

In any case remember we're all in it together. Most everyone here is just trying to help everyone else in the best way they know how.
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #35  
Naysayers,

Your replies are not well thought out. You apparently just want to be negative. You may have a basic understanding of hydraulics, but you pick parts of my statements to make a point, and ignore any qualifying language.

Only one example: My qualifications were that I needed to lift 700 lbs. in MORE than 1 second. I never set a top limit, but suggested 2 seconds was also reasonable. I KNOW there is enough fluid and enough mechanical advantage in a 2 ton bottle jack to lift 700 lbs 3 inches in two seconds. Anyone that can think will also know that.

4000/666 ~ 6. 666 is close enough to 700 and I want even numbers.

If I pivot a lever at one end and place my 2 ton bottle jack under the lever at the 1 inch point. (for the **** retentive I'll substitute a knife edge for the jack anvil.) Now I'll hang a 666 lb. weight at the 7 inch point.

Result if the bottle jack moves 1/8 per each "pump" of the handle with the 666 lb. the bottle jack will then move up 1/2 inch in 4 pumps of the handle. Since the lever has a 6-1 mechanical advantage the 666 lb. weight will move 3 inches. I can easily pump that jack 4 times in 1 second. My grandmother can probably pump it 4 times in 2 seconds.

If the jack ram will only move 1/16 of an inch in one pump then I can do the job in 2 seconds.

All that hoodoo voodoo math you've been throwing at me is wrong. Maybe grounded in truth, but mistakes were made. And don't be telling me that my example is not relevant. Work is work(scientifically). If the jack will do the job with the lever it can be configured to do it mostly hydraulically. I knew it would work when I asked the question. I didn't ask if it would work, I just wanted someone to look at what I was doing to see if I left something out. Not sure I explained the situation properly as few have indicated they understood what I wanted to do. That would be my fault.

HERE IS A THOUGHT DON'T ASK FOR HELP YOU "KNOW IT ALL" SHUT OFF THE COMPUTER AND GO BUILD IT. YOUR THREAD IS POINTLESS
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack
  • Thread Starter
#36  
So now that you've got that out of your system. Care to comment on either the original post or the physics of the last post. I believe I'm correct, if so then living under a bridge didn't hurt my reasoning any. :laughing:

ljg
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #37  
So now that you've got that out of your system. Care to comment on either the original post or the physics of the last post. I believe I'm correct, if so then living under a bridge didn't hurt my reasoning any. :laughing:

ljg

Glad to see you back!

I'd say go for it and let us know how the build progresses.

What are you building anyway?
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #38  
I didn't ask if it would work, I just wanted someone to look at what I was doing to see if I left something out.

If you left something out then it would not work , so what are we supposed to answer then. You have spent more time posting than it would take to build it , again turn off the computer and DO IT !
 
/ Pump from Bottle Jack #39  
Without intimate knowledge of how a jack works, this modification of a jack could only result in a complete waste of time, energy, money (not to mention dangerous hazards from poor fabrication methods).....why not just buy (or find) the right components to make what you want.......

Manual pumps are not new to hydraulics, they have been used for many years...If a bottle jack manufacturer could have done this years ago you'd have seen this........

I have a project of making a dump trailer with a rebuilt manual pump that is perfect for this application too.....Power Packer 92 SERIES PUMPS.....

It has a double acting pump, whereas each movement of the handle raises the load (both directions)......
 

Marketplace Items

JOHN DEERE 331G SKID STEER (A62129)
JOHN DEERE 331G...
2012 MCLAUGLIN/VERMEER V800AWXT VACUUM EXCAVATOR (A57880)
2012...
2003 Ford F-250 Pickup Truck (A61568)
2003 Ford F-250...
KBH Tank Trailer (A61307)
KBH Tank Trailer...
2017 INTERNATIONAL 4300 4X2 26FT CDL REQUIRED BOX TRUCK (A59906)
2017 INTERNATIONAL...
2025 Kivel Fork and Frame Mini Skid Steer Attachment (A61567)
2025 Kivel Fork...
 
Top