Question on loader problems for a 7360ss

[MajMac392]

Rozett and Gamble have answered so I may be off base. Rozett has the tractor and Gamble sells/works them so they know the tractor better than I. I thought the majority of the problems with cracking flanges, etc was on the older 7000 series, (7019, 723X, 727X) and not the 7360 which I thought was a somewhat larger tractor than the 7000 series. I have read that the cracking was caused by improper loader or back hoe work as well, maybe both. As I have listened to Rozett and others it sounds like a tractor I wouldn’t mind stepping up to ‘if’ it was still made and ‘if’ I ever replaced my 7234. That said, I have a Bush Hog loader on my 7234 installed by the dealer at the time of delivery. It was several hundred dollars cheaper than the CC/Woods loader but it is not a quick detach loader either if that is one of your requirements. I have only taken my BH loader off once in the 8-9 years since I have owned my tractor. It is a very rugged loader that had better specs than the CC loader but the finish was not as nice. I think if you read back on the posts with the cracking problem it was with the smaller 7000 series and many of those problems seem to be taken care of by careful maintenance and loctite. I only have 200+ hours on my tractor but I have used it fairly hard and I have never had a problem with the bolts. Knock on wood!!

My .02

 

[MajMac392]

Rozett and Gamble have answered so I may be off base. Rozett has the tractor and Gamble sells/works them so they know the tractor better than I. I thought the majority of the problems with cracking flanges, etc was on the older 7000 series, (7019, 723X, 727X) and not the 7360 which I thought was a somewhat larger tractor than the 7000 series. I have read that the cracking was caused by improper loader or back hoe work as well, maybe both. As I have listened to Rozett and others it sounds like a tractor I wouldn’t mind stepping up to ‘if’ it was still made and ‘if’ I ever replaced my 7234. That said, I have a Bush Hog loader on my 7234 installed by the dealer at the time of delivery. It was several hundred dollars cheaper than the CC/Woods loader but it is not a quick detach loader either if that is one of your requirements. I have only taken my BH loader off once in the 8-9 years since I have owned my tractor. It is a very rugged loader that had better specs than the CC loader but the finish was not as nice. I think if you read back on the posts with the cracking problem it was with the smaller 7000 series and many of those problems seem to be taken care of by careful maintenance and loctite. I only have 200+ hours on my tractor but I have used it fairly hard and I have never had a problem with the bolts. Knock on wood!!

My .02

 

[rozett]

As MajMac said, the 7360 is a different tractor than the rest of the (Mitsubishi made) 7000 series. It's bigger all around and has few common parts with the others. It also uses a different loader than the others. This is reenforced by the fact that Mahindra picked up the Mitsubishi line that Cub used to sell as the 7000 series, except for the 7360.

My loader is the Cub Model 485 loader. I do not know the exact Woods model number, but I assume it is the 1012 model from Woods. IF you need some of the specs, let me know and I can look them up tonight when I'm home.

 

[rozett]

As MajMac said, the 7360 is a different tractor than the rest of the (Mitsubishi made) 7000 series. It's bigger all around and has few common parts with the others. It also uses a different loader than the others. This is reenforced by the fact that Mahindra picked up the Mitsubishi line that Cub used to sell as the 7000 series, except for the 7360.

My loader is the Cub Model 485 loader. I do not know the exact Woods model number, but I assume it is the 1012 model from Woods. IF you need some of the specs, let me know and I can look them up tonight when I'm home.

 

[dweitzel]

Thanks again. I found the schematic for the 485 loader on partstree.com The 485 mounting system looks almost identical to a woods loader that a friend of mine has on a 3130 Kubota. I think the 1012 woods is a newer version of the 485.

I have never read any problems with the trans flanges on the 7360, just the 72xx series and I was hoping that that did not carry over to the 7360ss. I really glad I found this forum and I appreciate the responses. Looks like I'll be looking at the woods and the westnedorf loader tomorrow to compare the two side by side. Looks like the woods is the leader at this point.

If anyone else has any comments on what to watch for or any problems with the 7360 and loaders, please post and help a newbie out.

Thanks again. - David.

 

[dweitzel]

Thanks again. I found the schematic for the 485 loader on partstree.com The 485 mounting system looks almost identical to a woods loader that a friend of mine has on a 3130 Kubota. I think the 1012 woods is a newer version of the 485.

I have never read any problems with the trans flanges on the 7360, just the 72xx series and I was hoping that that did not carry over to the 7360ss. I really glad I found this forum and I appreciate the responses. Looks like I'll be looking at the woods and the westnedorf loader tomorrow to compare the two side by side. Looks like the woods is the leader at this point.

If anyone else has any comments on what to watch for or any problems with the 7360 and loaders, please post and help a newbie out.

Thanks again. - David.

 

[dweitzel]

I compared the model 160 westendorf and 1012 woods side by side today and I have to say there is no comparison. The Woods wins hands down for thickenss of material and craftsmanship. Woods it is!

The bush hog is not available in a quick detach. I think I want that option.

Again, thanks. If anyone else has any comments, please post them.

David

 

[dweitzel]

I compared the model 160 westendorf and 1012 woods side by side today and I have to say there is no comparison. The Woods wins hands down for thickenss of material and craftsmanship. Woods it is!

The bush hog is not available in a quick detach. I think I want that option.

Again, thanks. If anyone else has any comments, please post them.

David