MtnViewRanch
Elite Member, Advertiser
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2005
- Messages
- 10,641
- Tractor
- Mahindra 7520, Mahindra 3215HST, Case 580 extendahoe, Case 310 dozer, Parsons trencher, Cat D6,
I am going to go the other way on this. Snow moves alot easier than dirt. I wouldnt want any less than a 6' blade and would even be looking at lighter 7' blades IF snow is all you will be moving.
Being able to spin the blade 180 degrees has to do with blade design and not the tractor. The bigger the blade, the farther back it needs to be in order to spin around. So the hitch part of the blade needs to be made longer.
I have a 7' blade. My tractor is only a little bigger than yours. It dont even know it is there with a blade full of snow. But I also keep up with it too and I aint trying to bust through 4' drifts. But even so. I think it would handle it just fine.
Dirt is a different story though. If you think there is even the slightest possibility of using the blade for dirt work, A smaller and heavier 5' blade is what I would want.
So your L3200 that is 40% heavier than his Max 28 should handle a rear blade the same as yours ??? :confused2:
Even if he is only using it for snow removal, unless all he gets is light fluffy snow, I would think that a 6' would be the absolute maximum width.
But then I am of the mind set that I want the maximum size implement that I am able to use to it's fullest capacity most of the time. I can't even image what it must be like to have an implement that you can only use to it's full capability half or even less of the time.
Just my opinion, YMMV.