Wish people wouldn't use "FTF" without context.
FTF = Failure To Feed
FTF= Failure To Fire
Bruce
Sorry about that FTF "Failure to Function", covers jams, failure to feed, failure to fire and just about anything as the "failures to function" consisted of just about everything. I suspect some were the result of not being broken in, some bad smithing and others I just don't know.
No suit needed TripleR.. sure plenty of custom 1911's have problems both FTF and FTF

but mine doesn't

. They can be rock solid reliable as any Smith or Glock. It depends on who is doing the work on them. As far as the Remington R1. I don't have a clue. I have never seen one. But with CNC made guns nowadays there is no reason a box stock gun cannot be reliable.. NOT so 20 years ago.. If it would go bang out of the box you were lucky then.. Colts were the worst in my opinion..but no box stock 1911 could be counted on without giving it to a "smith" that knew what he was doing.
James K0UA ....1911's forever:thumbsup:
I have read a couple of favorable articles on the Remington, but have no personal experience with them.
My newest Colt was bought in the 80's, so the problems you mentioned with the older guns was probably why they weren't reliable. The only one I have now is a stock Gold Cup National Match Series 70. It's fun to shoot, but not reliable.
Interestingly, I was poised to buy a Kimber a couple of months ago when I decided to get my
L5740; trying to decide between a Tactical and Ultra Carry. I wasn't going to carry it, I just like shooting them. Of course I also want a Sig 220 Match Elite. My son has had his eyes on my 220 for quite some time. Always seems to be something I would like to have but really don't need.
It may be faulty logic on my part, but since all my training, qualifications were with S&W revolvers and Glocks, it seems if I ever have to use a weapon, it might be good to be able to show a record of ongoing qualifications; maybe, maybe not.