Here are a couple of things to consider, David.
I'll say again that I don't know anything about SS, but the bit of reading that I've done says that you can expect a 30% decrease in the payment when taking at age 62 vs full retirement age. I notice that in your calculation that it only gets knocked down by 20%.
Of course, everyone's health prospects are different, but if we're just working with average lifespans (and it doesn't make a great deal of difference), but just to be correct 78 isn't the number to use. The OECD says that the life expectancy
at birth for someone in the US is 78.6 years, but the life expectancy for a male who has already made it to 65 years old is 83.1.
Health status - Life expectancy at birth - OECD Data
Health status - Life expectancy at 65 - OECD Data
Chris
Hi Chris, You are correct but you miss my point in that illustration. I noted that I used numbers that had been rounded off, picked #s that were close to reality for my situation. But still easy enough that one could follow along and most likely do the math in their head as they were reading. That was the point. To make it easier to understand that one should really crunch their own numbers while considering their own spot in life. Many people, agencies, polls, etc., say to just wait as long as you can to draw ss payments. I don't believe that's true, along with many others. Notice I also said I'll use 66 in the illustration vs. my FRA of 66.5 That was for easy figuring also. But if I had used 66.5, that would've given me another 6 months ($12K more in my up front payouts...$2000 x 6 months). Another $12K invested over the years would even drive my point home more in my illustration. It would've lengthened my 0% tin can illustration. But multiplying uneven large numbers by fractional years makes it harder to follow along in a quick read.
I'm proof positive that it doesn't take a financial guru to do well in the market. I have a 2yr technical degree in the electrical field from 40+ yrs ago. I can't cite all the fancy financial algorithms or do calculus or that quantitative financial figuring. Although I did see the movie "A Beautiful Mind". :laughing: However, with a little reading, some simple night classes, etc., I can understand most terms once their explained, as could anyone else. Investing with sound practices without panicking, learning about index funds, ETFs, and mutual funds, (low expense ratios) will be enough to put anyone leaps and bounds ahead of passbook savings over time. That's me as a prime example. I've never had a paid financial advisor that benefited me. Rather, they benefited from me when I was young. It was a good lesson for me. Looking at my 2 Schwab accounts (personal and pension rollover) the combined lifetime average return is just over 13%. Not too bad for a trade school average joe. If I would've used my real figures in my illustration the percentage of my return over the last 4 years would've provoked laughs and all kinds of remarks. the last few years have been wildly great for my returns, some of which was recovery from a previous down trend. So I think my use of numbers and time was pretty fair and reflected that at a bare minumim (0% to 2.5%) return on money that's in your hand from early ss benefits can even out or surpass the benefits of waiting til a later date to retire. Again, depending on your needs, health insurance, rainy day funds, investment strategy, etc.
You brought up the life expectancy as determined by the OECD that is 83.1 years for a male who is already 65 yrs old. That is according to OECD. Their are all kinds of data collection and others that say the life expectancy is much less, a little less, the same, and even longer. Who does one believe the most. I think we are not too far apart. I used the example of 78 - 80 yrs as a sort of average of quite a few different sources that I had looked at. Plus, now they're saying the life expectancy of a male (in the US) has been declining in each of the last 3 years. Believable? who knows. But for the illustration to get people to start thinking.....your figure or mine....are acceptable. Even yours is closer to mine than age 90 (again, which I used to put more leverage on waiting to take ss payments rather than at age 62. The obits seem show more people passing before age 83 than after. If one lives to age 90 they get a pretty big write up. If they live to be 100 they usually make the national news!
Cheers!
David