Farmwithjunk
Super Member
LoneCowboy said:176 (6', commercial, chains, 2000 bucks)
SE8A (8' commercial, 5000 bucks)
I wasn't as up to date on model designations for Rhino as with other brands. After spending a little more time researching them, I'm up to speed on what's what with them. (I'm shopping for a couple HEAVY duty 6' mowers myself)
176? I see a 172 listed in their product line. It's a 72" ECONOMY grade, light to medium duty cutter.
SE8A. Double spindle, medium duty economy level 8' cutter.
Neither are recommended as commercial level mowers by Servis-Rhino. Both are targeting "home-owner, hobby rancher, occasional user" markets.
Next level "up" from 172 series, the 272, is comparable to Bush Hog 296 or Woods BB720. (medium duty) I'm shopping for CY72 or GR72 models. (heavy duty or EXTREME heavy duty) I'm leaning towards the CY72 at this point. I'm comparing Rhino and Bush Hog only at this stage.
BUT... it looks like the tailwheels are of simular design, albiet lighter weight material as their heavy duty and extreme heavy duty lines. These 2 models are anywhere from 500 to 1000 lighter than their extreme duty counterparts. While a great deal of that weight is in places like the decks, the gearboxes, and the hitch, a sizable portion of weight reduction is obviously in the tailwheel assemblies. That said, I still don't see even a light duty mower having a chronic problem with tailwheels bending from normal use. The Rhino dealer I'm talking with currently sells 30 to 45 mowers per year. He claims to have sold ONE tailwheel from his parts dept in the last 3 years, replacing one that was damaged when the operator backed into a concrete culvert headwall.
Last edited: