s219
Super Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2011
- Messages
- 8,548
- Location
- Virginia USA
- Tractor
- Kubota L3200, Deere X380, Kubota RTV-X
However, as has been explained, normally there would be a middleman and the dealer (ie: Mahindra USA and the Mahindra dealer) not one (Rural King) so they are in fact getting rid of one of the middlemen between the manufacturer and the buyer.
Aaron Z
Big deal -- then Kubota could be saying they have one less middle man too since they make their own tractors and they don't have another company in the loop. And there are tractor companies like Deere that manufacture some of their tractors and sub-out manufacture of other tractors. Should they say some models cut out a middle man but other models add a middle man? I just think it's an arbitrary and pointless description when there is obviously someone in the middle no matter what.
Kubota -> Dealer -> Customer
Deere -> Dealer -> Customer
Yanmar -> Deere -> Dealer -> Customer
TYM -> RK -> Customer
TYM -> Cabelas -> Customer
Jinma -> Nortrac (Northern Tool) -> Customer
And so on...
Unless a product is sold factory direct to the customer, somebody is always in the middle. Doesn't matter if it's a dealer, an importer, a retail chain with a house brand, etc. There is nothing wrong with any of these business models, but none of them are direct to the customer.
If I was RK I would be playing up the fact that they are a national retail chain and they have a lot of stores that will sell tractors and support the customer. There is a middle man and there is a good reason for it. The middle man is a national retail chain and not some independent dealer. The middle man adds value in a way that the manufacturer cannot. Don't pretend there is no middle man.