Historians are not a really a bad lot but they do have there own research and view. Point in case. Lets say you have your annual church picnic, and you ask 6 attendees to write up an article for the paper. Reading the 6 stories with there variations, might suggest they may did not attended the same picnic. But do note, this is normal for people to see something, then write down their impressions with wide variations. Try asking a Juvenal to write there impression of that picnic? :laughing: So we can't expect different historical writers to write the same on a same subject either..