Capricious
Platinum Member
...just a thought..a bar tender fixes a drink, the waitress takes it to the customer....the customer leaves drunk, hits and kills someone..the bar tender goes to jail...he was at fault...this can apply to the welder here, even if he built it to the owners specs...right or wrong. Now back to the bar...why wouldn't the waitress who serves the drink be liable? The bar tender has no clue on who the customer is, or if he?she is drunk...but the waitress does!
I am not so sure the bar tender would be liable if he/she had no knowledge of, or could not be reasonable expected to be aware of, the customer's inebriated condition.
The reason that ANYONE might be liable in that situation would be because they would be aware of, or should be aware of, the customer's (assumed temporary) reduced mental abilities.
The welder, on the other hand, would have no reason to assume that the buyer of the trailer would use it in an inappropriate manner.
Automobiles are equipped with steering wheels (for the most part). The manufacturers of automobiles assume, and have the right to assume, that the operators of those vehicles are aware that suddenly turning that steering wheel to full-lock, while driving @70 mph on the highway, is an inappropriate action that will most likely lead to an unpleasant outcome. At some point the operator of the equipment becomes responsible for the safe operation of the equipment.
Occasionally juries decide that the "point" is rather distant but those instances are often outliers, which is the very reason one often hears of them.