weesa20
Silver Member
I think much of the issue has to do with dealer support and parts availability. I was recently seriously considering buying a TYM 273 to replace my GC. The closest dealer is 250 miles and the closest one with the actual tractor on the lot was 300 miles. I asked my MF dealer if they were interested in picking up any new brands and they said they had looked into TYM and Kioti and parts availability was the problem. this company has a good rep in the area. If they picked a different brand and their customers bought those tractors, the customers would expect the same support that they get with the MFs, but the dealer could not supply that level of support b/c parts are not always available.
Also, the best price I could find on the TYM was $14,500 with FEL (15,500 was usual). That's 30 hp tractor territory aound here. Also, global economics comes into play. A smaller company without a distribution and shipping network needs to ship from SE Asia at a huge premium, including parts after the sale which is where I think most companies make the $$, all adding to the initial cost of the machine. Its more cost effective to build a tractor for a well known company that already has a distribution network. The company then adds a name "premium" to the cost.
Lastly, there is a ton of innovation and R&D that goes into the production of SCUTs to make a very capable tractor in a small chassis and the price reflects it. (not everyone wants a big hunkin' machine that was designed in the 60's...) My GC and my Dad's 2210 do way more than any of the older (1940s-50s) CUTS that he owned before, and I don't spend as much time working on it as I do using it.
I love my GC, it does what I ask it to do and my grass still grows where a drove over it. Can'd ask for much more.
W
Also, the best price I could find on the TYM was $14,500 with FEL (15,500 was usual). That's 30 hp tractor territory aound here. Also, global economics comes into play. A smaller company without a distribution and shipping network needs to ship from SE Asia at a huge premium, including parts after the sale which is where I think most companies make the $$, all adding to the initial cost of the machine. Its more cost effective to build a tractor for a well known company that already has a distribution network. The company then adds a name "premium" to the cost.
Lastly, there is a ton of innovation and R&D that goes into the production of SCUTs to make a very capable tractor in a small chassis and the price reflects it. (not everyone wants a big hunkin' machine that was designed in the 60's...) My GC and my Dad's 2210 do way more than any of the older (1940s-50s) CUTS that he owned before, and I don't spend as much time working on it as I do using it.
I love my GC, it does what I ask it to do and my grass still grows where a drove over it. Can'd ask for much more.
W