Should all cities ban cell phones while driving?

[Freds]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( As long as people use handsfree items.. I don't see a problem with talking and driving... If you ban talking on a hands free cell phone while driving.. you might as well ban 'talking' while driving.. )</font>

I was going to say something about this earlier, but since it came up.....
I think there is a big difference between talking to someone on a cell phone, hands free or not, and talking to someone else in the car. How many times has your passenger ever said, "Look out!"? It happens, hopefully less the older we get, but a cell phone can't give you an extra set of eyes to watch the road.

That said, PA passed a law last year restricting dogs' movement inside a vehicle because they found loose dogs contribute to accidents. I DO believe everything is being overlegislated, but too few use common sense anymore.

 

[flwiii]

<font color="blue"> I DO believe everything is being overlegislated, but too few use common sense anymore. </font>

Amen to that. Common sense has been falling out peoples ears for a long time. Just look at the frivilous law suits for proof of that. Makes me think of Bill Engvall talking about warnings on products. For every warning label you see, just how many people used the product improperly before they had to put on the warning?

Most people would not attempt to trim there hedges with a lawn mower but believe it, a couple of twits did. Thus the warning label on power mowers.

I've seen my fair share of people with no common sense as a Customer Service Supervisor at Sea Ray. Had one dude try to sue because his auto-pilot did not stop his boat from slamming into an island while he was out jumping its wake with his jet ski. <font color="red"> No one was on board the 40 footer.</font>

 

[frank29]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( ........Most people would not attempt to trim there hedges with a lawn mower but believe it, a couple of twits did........)</font>Years ago, in another life, I went to a coworkers home....he lived in one of those developments with 1/4 acre or so lots.....his neighbor was using a push mower to cut the grass BAREFOOT. You guys may not believe it; in fact, if I hadn't seen it, I would be tempted to call it bogus. To make it even worse, the guy wasn't some wet behind the ears kid, he was a grown man, maybe 40 or 50 years old.

 

[Henro]

Frankly, I'm sick of seeing people with cell phones stuck in their ears going 25 mph in a 40 mph zone, or riding the passing lane on an expressway at the same or slower speed than cars in the slow lane.

Laws turn me off...but not as much as people whose brains slow down when they put a phone to their ears.

On the Japan front, I don't know about driving, but I do know that cell phones are not to be used on public transportation, like trains, busses and subways. And 99.9 percent of the people follow these rules. I imagine it is the same for driving there...

On Public transportation text messaging/email/games are OK though (all would be REALLY bad when driving).

As much as I hate any restriction on personal freedom, when I see someone else's behavior affecting others who don't want to be affected, I say knock of that behavior. If what one does affects only himself, let it go. If what one does affects others who don't want to be affected, stop that behavior.

Cell phones in the driver's ear get's a big thumbs down in my opinion. I am as guilty as anyone else probably. In this case pass the law, and let each of us take our chances when we answer the phone, just like we do when we exceed the speed limit.

If nothing else, call length would probably shorten...

 

[Alan L.]

Absolutely not. I find the phone is not a distraction, any more so than if someone were in the truck with me, talking. And holding it in my hand has no effect, I drive one-handed phone or no phone. I guess if I was driving a standard it my be an issue, but I quit buying manual transmissions a long time ago due to fatigue in traffic.

 

[Soundguy]

I agree... if someone talking to you is a distrraction .. then we don't need radio's in cars either.. like I said.. if that law passes.. they might as well remove all but 1 seat int he car, and take the radio out. Better yet.. how about just educate people.. not legislate people...

Soundguy

 

[BlueRidge]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Laws turn me off...but not as much as people whose brains slow down when they put a phone to their ears. )</font>


This month marks 22 years in the cellphone business for me. I got my start installing the things before the network was even on the air. I've followed this debate for years now, and my viewpoint has changed.

When I first heard the reports that researchers in Toronto found that talking on a cellphone was equivalent to being legally drunk, my first thought was to wonder what their angle was, since that was obviously ridiculous.

Now I'm convinced they were right, for SOME people. Maybe MANY people. I've seen it too often to doubt it - some folks just can't talk & drive. They absolutely become lost in their own world, and are a danger to others.

When cellular was new, all of the customers were high end executives and sales types. The cars were Mercedes & BMWs, with an occasional Caddy. Then it was fleet vehicles - a LOT of mid-sized GMs. But still, better educated people, for the most part.

Then the construction crowd found out about it, and it was pickup trucks. Then the independent truckers, and watch out for those positive ground Freightliners! /forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif

Now it's every teenybopper on the planet! And anyone who can fog a mirror.

So, now a great many people whose brains are just barely able to cope with driving, are now adding the distraction of yakking on a phone.

It's not good. However, laws that require the use of hands-free devices miss the point. The research (now by several different researchers) shows that it is the CONVERSATION, not dialing or holding the phone, that is tghe big distraction. For some reason not well understood, the fact that the conversation is taking place with someone OUTSIDE the vehicle makes our brains react differently.

I like what Huntington Beach, CA, has done. Have an accident , and they find out it was due to some distraction (cellphone, yelling at kids, changing radio station), and you get a moving violation on your record, and a good hit in the pocketbook.

No prior restraint, just holding people accountable. I'd be in favor of letting officers pull people over and cite them if they see they are not paying attention to traffic. Whether that's because they are yakking, drinking coffee, putting on makeup or reading the newspaper!

 

[JoeR]

I really believe this depends on the individual. Although, passing laws to stop the few idiots seems excessive. Anytime the government tells me they are passing a law for my safety, I start to think it is nothing more than a means to gain control.

I remember when they mandated seatbelt laws. We were told it would lower our insurance and save lives. I don't know if it saved lives, but it didn't affect my insurance.

Now they tell people not to smoke at home or they will lose their job, I personally don't smoke nor do I like the smell of it, but that is over the top.

I am not trying to change subjects, and do agree in accountability over an all encompassing law.

Joe

 

[PineRidge]

Personally I would vote to ban the use of cell phones while a motor vehicle is in motion and that includes hands free units which are also a distraction. I am however not opposed to any driver pulling to the side of the road to use his/hers cell phone unless it gets to be so bad that all the stopped vehicles impede the moving traffic.

While we're at it lets also make it illegal to eat, litter, put on makeup, shave, and play loud obnoxious music that can be heard in the next county while operating any motor vehicle. Turn the loud music down, I'm hard of hearing and it even annoys me. /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif

And AndyM, after you collect all those cans, bottles, and litter please quit throwing it in front of my place as you drive by. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Drive careful out there guys!

 

[turnkey4099]

Yes, there are a lot of distractions out there and none of them are good. As for the CP it is a convenient target as it is something that can be directly observed. Frankly I am against using one while driving, in theaters, in classes, etc. I foresee the day when certain places will be blanketed with CP blocking devices as it has been proven that joe citizen has no concern for his fellow citizens.

I predict that, as far as CP use in vehicles goes, there will be a nontamperable device installed in every car that will not permit CP use while the vehicle is in motion. A good thing IMO provided it allows 911 use.

Harry K