So how would you build a stump buster

   / So how would you build a stump buster #31  
Last edited:
   / So how would you build a stump buster #32  
   / So how would you build a stump buster #33  
Not being one to make art out of stump cores, I can't say it would pencil out for me.

However to your question, the friction goes by area, so it is an R-squared effect, but the cutting load goes up as R. My bet would be for a centered bore, it is largely R (i.e. 2*Pi*R, or 18 vs 30 on some arbitrary scale of work for 30 vs 50.)

All the best,

Peter

Thanks for the links.
I really like this one;
YouTube - Rotor stumps extractor.
There is something appealing about being able to take out a big "core" that can be disposed of or used vs making everything into chips.

Strength, weight and ballasting of the tractor is an issue, that one comes up off the uphill rear wheel at one point.
Duhh, it may be best to figger the direction of torque FIRST and face the tractor with the LEFT wheel uphill - if you HAVE TO use this thing on a side slope ?
Maybe not, rock up then down may be more likely to roll the tractor than rock down ?

Even so, BIG HEFTY tractors seem to be needed for this core extractor.
Not sure how it would scale down, but those are 45cm and 50cm diameter "hole saws" (-:
and were developed largely for root wood recovery.

30 cm may require less than 60% of the power for 50 cm - I can't quite figger if it would be a linear or a square law thang.

Not economic for ME, that's for sure.
 
   / So how would you build a stump buster #35  
Thanks for the links.
I really like this one;
YouTube - Rotor stumps extractor.
There is something appealing about being able to take out a big "core" that can be disposed of or used vs making everything into chips.

Strength, weight and ballasting of the tractor is an issue, that one comes up off the uphill rear wheel at one point.
Duhh, it may be best to figger the direction of torque FIRST and face the tractor with the LEFT wheel uphill - if you HAVE TO use this thing on a side slope ?
Or, if theyd just arrange to keep the auger/cutter axis vertical front to back thered be much less side tip torque. Wonder why they didnt. :confused3:
Perhaps they adopted this to counteract the opposing tip moment resulting from the lateral force to the right, reacted into the tractor by the frame holding the spinning bit. With it canted forward as much as it is tho, the horizontal component of rotational torque appears to counteract this too much. Some fine tuning is in order. ;)
larry
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

CAT 573 FELLER BUNCHER (A51242)
CAT 573 FELLER...
2014 Chevrolet Tahoe SUV (A50324)
2014 Chevrolet...
2014 GMC Sierra Pickup Truck (A50323)
2014 GMC Sierra...
2014 Gillig 31+56 Low Floor Bus (A50323)
2014 Gillig 31+56...
Kubota SVL65-2 Open Station Rubber Block Tread Skid Steer (A52128)
Kubota SVL65-2...
2004 JOHN DEERE 5205 TRACTOR (A51406)
2004 JOHN DEERE...
 
Top