Raspy
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2006
- Messages
- 1,636
- Location
- Smith Valley, Nevada
- Tractor
- NH TC29DA, F250 Tremor, Jeep Rubicon
I am still very, very early in design, I have two really basic questions:
1. Why the drain back system in the collectors instead of antifreeze and just stopping circulation based on temp differential?
2. What do you do with the waste heat in the summer? I would think you could not use enough hot water to keep the collectors cool.
These are two of the best and earliest questions in your design! You are definitely on the right track!
You could go either way. Antifreeze or drainback. Either way you need a heat exchanger to move the energy to another fluid and both will be closed loop.
Antifreeze: You have to decide which antifreeze. Ethylene is out of the question for me because it's very toxic and that brings a bunch of design considerations. Silicone or oil are out of the question because they are hard to manage, viscous and have a low specific heat. Propylene Glycol is very good. But it's an additional cost, requires the proper ratio, a standby amount for maintenance and topping off, possible changing in a few years to prevent PH problems, more complicated plumbing to allow pump changes and air management, and it must endure stagnation temps. This may require a higher pressure that is maintained to prevent boiling. Don't get me wrong, I like it, but it is not without it's drawbacks to me. I did this on my fathers house in 1979. It is still running, but has had some maintenance issues.
Drainback. Simple single wall heat exchanger or submerged coil. No toxic fluids. No freeze danger. Very simple plumbing. No cost for the fluid, which means easier handling later and simpler plumbing because you can dump it anytime and replace it anytime without considerations or hassle. It also has a designed in amount of air, so no air vents, no expansion tank, easy pump changes, no PH testing and no freeze testing. The highest specific heat, so the lowest operating temp and highest efficiency with minimal pump wattage. No matter what failure you can reasonably imagine with this system, the collectors are protected from freezing. If there is a leak, it's a small amount of water and its over: nothing toxic and no flooding.
Waste heat in the summer is always a consideration. The ultimate is to have a spa or pool to dump it into. If not that, it boils (pun intended) down to either stagnation, covering a few panels or having a very large storage and flagrantly using hot water. I always worry about stagnation and have a number of stories about that, but I recently removed a set of 30 year old collectors that had sat unused for a number of summers. They were fine. No apparent outgassing, no coating failure. Fine. So I have forced myself to concede that stagnating is not as bad as it seems. They are designed for that. And sitting empty is probably better than sitting full. Hence, drainback. Another way of limiting the overall output is to put a timer in that controls the power to the differential controller. A simple lamp timer from the hardware store is fine. Limit the run time to an hour or two a day, in the morning, based on the differential. Then the power goes off and it sits until the next morning. Some management is required, but it works. It's fun to see very high storage temps, but it is unnecessary. As long as the storage is above your domestic water temp, in the summer months, by 20 degrees or so, it's all you need until the next day.
There are other freeze protection systems too. Like draindown and recirculation. Please don't consider recirculation unless you live at sea level in Hawaii. Draindown brings it's own set of unnecessary problems. Bottom line is, the collectors must either be empty, or full of something that won't freeze. Empty is probably better in most situations.
Last edited: