OP
Seasoned Carpentry
New member
When I look at a problem I look for evidence. I've set forth the evidence I've gathered and the observations I've made. Soundguy, in your last post what struck me most is your series of assumptions: marginal clutch, substandard wiring, bushing and housing not machined well with many crankings exacerbating each of these, to the point where all of them add up to a starter not engaging. Or we have a clutch that is slipping. For me, when assumptions pile up, I look for the simplest explanation. Each one of these assumptions may be perfectly reasonable on their own. But all of these assumptions must be reasonable and have actually happened in this case for this line of reasoning to give an accurate result.
Either the clutch is bad and must be replaced anyway or all the machining defects must be aligning together to make the pinion gear hit the flywheel out of it's designed tolerances rather than engaging it. Upgrading the wire won't solve the problem in either case. I provided evidence that the undersized wire is not affecting the action of the starter in this case, at least as far as my ability with starter observations is concerned. I also did not observe slop in the pinion gear on its shaft and was quite impressed with how well the starter fit into its housing. The pinion gear showed wear I felt was indicative of good meshing.
I don't claim much experience with Jinma's, and nothing but adequate experience with machinery mechanics in general. But I do understand problem solving and the amazing power of assumptions to cause well intentioned people to reach conclusions forced by their assumptions.
In my opinion the evidence points to the clutch in the starter. I'd be interested in alternate explanations using the evidence I've presented here. Or explanations on why and how I'm misreading the evidence.
Either the clutch is bad and must be replaced anyway or all the machining defects must be aligning together to make the pinion gear hit the flywheel out of it's designed tolerances rather than engaging it. Upgrading the wire won't solve the problem in either case. I provided evidence that the undersized wire is not affecting the action of the starter in this case, at least as far as my ability with starter observations is concerned. I also did not observe slop in the pinion gear on its shaft and was quite impressed with how well the starter fit into its housing. The pinion gear showed wear I felt was indicative of good meshing.
I don't claim much experience with Jinma's, and nothing but adequate experience with machinery mechanics in general. But I do understand problem solving and the amazing power of assumptions to cause well intentioned people to reach conclusions forced by their assumptions.
In my opinion the evidence points to the clutch in the starter. I'd be interested in alternate explanations using the evidence I've presented here. Or explanations on why and how I'm misreading the evidence.