And yet there are those here who act like all the problems stem from the lack of an Occupancy Permit on a building that was just built
And yet there are those here who act like all the problems stem from the lack of an Occupancy Permit on a building that was just built
I cannot speak to that because, like everybody else, I don't have any insider information.
What I do know:
1) When in the middle of a lawsuit, until the lawsuit is settled, all attorneys advise their clients not to talk to anybody not involved with the lawsuit.
2) People in the community will talk and often talk smack assuming something is up (wrong) because nobody directly involved in the lawsuit is talking.
3) Idled employees may or may not also talk smack because they are not gainfully employed.
4) Idled employees will all at some point seek other work elsewhere because they too have bills to pay.
5) EA had a bunch of backorders and the new production facility was to help that.
6) Asking for payment upfront was to slow down demand that EA couldn't reasonably meet, but the orders kept coming in.
7) Ted had hired professional management most likely so he could focus on product design as well as marketing (making videos and such which is EA's online marketing strategy).
So yeah, based on what I do know, I doubt that Ted used customers' funds as his own money and to accuse Ted of commingling customer funds with his own funds is to claim Ted embezzled money.
Embezzling is a crime and Ted has not been accused of embezzlement. As such, I also know those people claiming he did are speculating, and frankly bearing false witness.