cdb2
Silver Member
This advocates the robbing peter to pay paul theory. Should American jobs and industry be put to pasture so Building companies here can pay less and exploit the exact thing the Chinese want?. A boon for one sector is a dead weight on another, is that really what we should be cheering on here?
On the contrary, cheaper materials mean more jobs in manufacturing and better quality of life for consumers through lower prices. The capital invested in steel production can be profitably put to use in other industries, as can the labor. But when you artificially increase the cost to produce goods, everyone gets poorer as a result. And it's worst of all for US manufacturers who will no longer be able to compete against global manufacturers who don't have artificially high production costs. That's robbing the US manufacturing and the average American consumer in order to pay the steel industry.
If tariffs and trade protection were really a panacea, why have previous tariffs failed to sustainably increase domestic steel production? Why have they instead led to manufacturing job loss and higher prices? When the same sort of tariff was tried in 2002, we did we lose more jobs in US manufacturing alone due to increased steel prices than the total number of people employed in the US steel industry?