Interesting note. I'll probably draw fire for some of my opinions but - let the discussion begin.
On sub-dividing - The old landowner rights verses the rights of others. When developers come in, they usually have to go through legal hoops at the state and county level. Some "rezoning" may be required. So where is the problem in that? Well the rezoning classifications usually never keep up with the development. Setbacks, easements, rights of way should come into play as "zones" butt up against each other.
In my part of the county/state this just doesn't happen. We have residental areas, 1/4 acre lots next to farms. The farmer thinks he still lives in an agricultural zone, the reality is he lives in a sub-division. Who changes behaviour here - the farmer, or his 2000 neighbors?
On yet another issue of sub-dividing. When do sub-division or zoning rules change? Zoning rules change in my part of the county/state - rarely. So in a rural residental zone, we have neighbors who believe they can do whatever they want, whenever. Never mind that the houses are all setback from the road 80 feet and are an acre or less apart. Firearms, racecars, late night work, off road vehicles, fireworks, loud music, etc. etc. all are issues, for your 500 neighbors, but the zoning rules do not deter any behaviour.
Places change, some people do not.
Over the last few years, my county has tried to approach developement of agricultural land with new land-use requirements. They have failed. The results are not pretty, and actually pit land-owners against home-owners.
We all need our space, but we also need to be aware and respectfull of others.
-Mike Z. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif