HeavyToy
Member
I think that I detect a tone . . . but before you get all sguirrelly please recognize that I was responding to the posting at the same time you were and not intending to refute your guestimation. Though generic "fiberglass" and SMC both use glass as reinforcement, they are not the same, which is why you can not use fiberglass to repair. I was saying that it was not generic "fiberglass". However, SMC is the process used for the hood but most likeley not for the grill/light nose or the instrument cowling. Note that on your hood the two are bonded together. It is not SMC, because it is in sheet form and does not flow as well to form tall ribs and bosses in conpression molding. BMC (Bulk Molding Compound), which would be like a pelletized SMC, is what would be able to be injection molded to get the ribs, bosses and details. My assasment was that it is injection molded and I was thinking that if the cowl was structural foam or glass reinforced structural foam, (widely used in the equipment industry) the part would be able to be painted directly out of the mold and could be a repairable thermoplastic.
Since I was not aware that we were bumping chests and thought that we were trying to figure out a way to repair the part, I was just advising that structural foam will be difficult to repair but a solvent will probably be the best bet as the plastic may be a thermoplastic rather than thermoset. If it has glass fill as well, it will be even more difficult as there will be a lesser percentage of plastic to bond in the crossection of the crack.
Since I was not aware that we were bumping chests and thought that we were trying to figure out a way to repair the part, I was just advising that structural foam will be difficult to repair but a solvent will probably be the best bet as the plastic may be a thermoplastic rather than thermoset. If it has glass fill as well, it will be even more difficult as there will be a lesser percentage of plastic to bond in the crossection of the crack.