DMW
Platinum Member
Having used an 60's era International B250 with a 6' rear blade (comparable to the Oliver) and an SCUT with a 48" boxblade with scarifiers on a 300' gravel drive, the SCUT won handily. There should be an adjustment on the 3pt arms to angle the boxblade to form a crown if needed. The boxbalde stays on the tractor all the time as a loader counterweight. Going wider than the tractor isn't always a good thing, it is too easy to catch it on things while driving past solid objects. Without the counterweight, the rear tires will lose traction with a heavy bucket load, allowing the tires to spin, rutting the grass, and making it unstable on slopes.
Go larger if you eventually plan on adding attachments like a post hole auger, or operating in wooded areas. The SCUT is too low to operate well.
Never missed the rear scraper blade. Had I got one for the SCUT, it would have sat unused for years, and haven't used the B250 in over a decade.
EA's land plane is really nice, but my driveway isn't long enough to warrant the expense.
My preference would be for turf tires. 4WD and a bucket of gravel provide good traction, also stops a lot of the rocking horse motion that produces washboards.
Go larger if you eventually plan on adding attachments like a post hole auger, or operating in wooded areas. The SCUT is too low to operate well.
Never missed the rear scraper blade. Had I got one for the SCUT, it would have sat unused for years, and haven't used the B250 in over a decade.
EA's land plane is really nice, but my driveway isn't long enough to warrant the expense.
My preference would be for turf tires. 4WD and a bucket of gravel provide good traction, also stops a lot of the rocking horse motion that produces washboards.