quicksandfarmer
Veteran Member
They already have to do this for income taxes. The manufacturer has to decide how much of the end-to-end profit on the tractor to declare in each country and pay taxes on. They have a fair bit of latitude, obviously they're going to try to shift as much of the declared profit to the place with the lowest rates. If they get too aggressive the government challenges their allocation of profit, there is a whole field of law called "transfer pricing" that deals with this.@5030 One of the biggest questions is how the value of those parts will be determined for the purpose of tariffs. I guess if there's an invoiced cost of an item it's easy but if an engine is manufactured by a mfg in Japan and then shipped to the US where the tractor is assembled, how will they be required to state the value? To the consumer that engine might cost $10,000 but every step back to the mfg factory in Japan cuts a big chunk off that price until you might wind up with a much smaller number to base the tariff. Let's say the material and labor cost is $2,000... now the tariff is about $500 on a $10,000 engine that goes into a $35,000 tractor that is assembled in the U.S. Now do that for a bunch of parts and pieces and maybe you've got $1,000 in tariffs on a $35,000 tractor vs 25% of a wholesale price of a tractor made entirely in South Korea and you begin to see how this can really hurt some brands and be much less impactful for others.
Tariffs are just another tax, they may change how companies choose to allocate their costs but they won't have to do anything they aren't already doing.