Edit: post some pics of the whole machine, too! I love this stuff!
Also- I've read some info in the past, be it accurate or not, that for faster spool on turbos a log manifold actually works quite well due to the turbulence it creates before the exhaust turbine. What are your thoughts on that?
Turbulence? Hogwash. Shortest runners possible retain more heat, smallest cross sectional area without going too fast retain the most velocity. Turbulence is bad.
Three types of energy are imparted on the turbine wheel- mass flow energy, heat energy, and pulse energy.
A divided scroll can get more of the pulse energy out but it only works up to about 4500 RPM and cylinder count must be even and at least 4. Volvo spent 8 million bucks proving this and wrote an SAE paper on it. This is why divided scroll turbine housings are popular on diesels, you get a little better pulse energy out of it. Divided housings must divide cylinders with the same piston motion, 6 cylinder engine with std firing order of 1-5-3-6-2-4 have pairs of 1+6, 2+5, 3+4, and these are divided to 1+2+3, 4+5+6, each side gets even pulses 240 crank degrees apart.
Ideal would be long tube header with merge collector but 70" long runners to match the 2500 RPM third harmonic are impossible and would kill the heat. Besides cracking all over all the time. Performance improvement would be marginal.
Log style vs tubular style | Turbobygarrett
Schedule 40 304 or 316 stainless weld ells are cheap, properly sized internally, will last forever.
I'll try to get some better pics later, and action vids.