dave1949
Super Star Member
I have about 8 hours use on my new 6" BX62 chipper now. I have been very pleased with how it chips. After reading the advice of BX chipper owners on TBN, I went with the manual/gravity feed and that has proven to be good, money saving advice. Thanks I can't picture the hydraulic feed being needed for homeowner use.
The only thing I have had to push into the hopper is apple limbs, apple is stiff wood and tends to have 90* branches. I have put 20' long 3"-4" maple, black cherry and ash saplings in and they get sucked right through.
Most of what I will chip is 3" or less. I went with the 6" chipper for the heavier flywheel and general ruggedness thinking it will hold up better than running a 4" chipper near it's max. capability.
I am powering the chipper with my NH TC40 (37 PTO HP) running a PTO speed of 540 RPM, that seems to have power to spare for this chipper. I haven't heard the engine grunt yet.
Thanks again to all the members who commented on Wallenstein chippers in general and the hydraulic versus manual feed questions. I feel like I was able to make an informed choice thanks to you.
Dave.
The only thing I have had to push into the hopper is apple limbs, apple is stiff wood and tends to have 90* branches. I have put 20' long 3"-4" maple, black cherry and ash saplings in and they get sucked right through.
Most of what I will chip is 3" or less. I went with the 6" chipper for the heavier flywheel and general ruggedness thinking it will hold up better than running a 4" chipper near it's max. capability.
I am powering the chipper with my NH TC40 (37 PTO HP) running a PTO speed of 540 RPM, that seems to have power to spare for this chipper. I haven't heard the engine grunt yet.
Thanks again to all the members who commented on Wallenstein chippers in general and the hydraulic versus manual feed questions. I feel like I was able to make an informed choice thanks to you.
Dave.