I'll pm you. We have systems on line here that have been working virtually non stop for 30 years, and that's the original resin bed. We do use carbon with the resin to reduce the chlorine, the primary culprit in the striation problems found in most resin, and I am familiar with the Sybron and Purolite as we have also used them both in the past.
I'm also familiar with the technetic, as they approached me when I owned my own company a few years ago. We tried their systems, and unfortunately, there were too many kinks. That was about 8 years ago or so and I believe they were introducing a new design. I'm sure they're better now. We installed about 40 units before giving up on it.
As for the efficiency, the amount of sodium dissolved is, of course, regulated my the amount of water dispensed. Less sodium, less water. I think we're splitting hairs here anyway, as we're talking about pennies worth of water, in either direction.
We want our systems to regen on average twice a week, not once, to avoid the channeling problems, etc. Our valve will monitor the amount of water use, and in 10% increments recapture only that which is necessary. In other words, if we have app. 37% capacity used, we'll regen at 40%. We really do not want to even approach 100 percent, because, as you stated, we would have terrible sodium/calcium exchange efficiency rates. Also, we are of course using soft water backwashing.
Our typical customers (please remember, we're talking residential systems on the average of 1 cubic foot) are using far less than one 40 lb bag of salt per month. Average dosage seems to be running between 2 and 4 lbs. Now that seems, to me, to be very efficient. FYI, in this area, the water is tyically running 8 to 10 grains.
To go back to the original question, I guess we'll just disagree on that one. /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif
Anthony