Help - I've been looking at welders, and the questions are coming faster than the answers. I've read a number of comparisons of the different methods, but for farm equipment welding - how do the different types shake out?
I'd about decided, that a decent capacity AC buzz box was the most generally useful type welder there is for this stuff. Until I started reading the Richard Finch book, and he seems really big on gas, tig, and mig, and doesn't seem to have much use for arc welding.
I understand that oxy-acetylene has tons of uses in addition to welding, but for sticking thick wall tubing, angle and flat HRS together it seems to me that a buzz box is still the answer. Add into the equation that my brother has a Miller MIG from an autobody project a few years ago. I suspect that a reason for Finch's minization of SMAW may be that he does have access to Oxyfuel, TIG and MIG.
How does oxy-acetylene compare to buzz boxes for operational costs?
Do the cutting and heating capabilities of the torch warrant using oxyacetylene for general purpose farm duty welding in place of a Hobart or Lincon 235 Amp AC unit?
I'd about decided, that a decent capacity AC buzz box was the most generally useful type welder there is for this stuff. Until I started reading the Richard Finch book, and he seems really big on gas, tig, and mig, and doesn't seem to have much use for arc welding.
I understand that oxy-acetylene has tons of uses in addition to welding, but for sticking thick wall tubing, angle and flat HRS together it seems to me that a buzz box is still the answer. Add into the equation that my brother has a Miller MIG from an autobody project a few years ago. I suspect that a reason for Finch's minization of SMAW may be that he does have access to Oxyfuel, TIG and MIG.
How does oxy-acetylene compare to buzz boxes for operational costs?
Do the cutting and heating capabilities of the torch warrant using oxyacetylene for general purpose farm duty welding in place of a Hobart or Lincon 235 Amp AC unit?