I have often heard that becasue of the lag time with GST, folks on hills get a special treat when shifting the GST type transmission. What I don't understand is how a FST or other manuals are any different. On either you can easily depress the brakes to accomodate a shift. Perhaps those with GST are so accustom to not using the brakes for shifting that the thought rarely enters their head. The glide shift transmission is very slick and easy. Shifting from one gear to the other is now almost automatic. That being said, I hear the argument for HST is that folks don't want to do all that shifting, frankly, on my manual tractor, I pretty much find a gear and stick with it. I'm not running through gears like a truck or car. I can easily mow in 4th or 5th on my manual. I start in 4th gear and keep it in fourth. Is this a practice unique to me? Now with loader work, it's another story, on a
L4850, I typically use 4th for manuvering and drop into second for burying into a pile. On GST, that is very fast, on FST (
L4850)it's a bit slower. On either, using the shuttle for reverse is a snap. So why did I buy HST on my
L3830 you might wonder? For mowing, depending on terrain, HST can have big advantages. I have plenty of small ruts that would jarr you apart if you did not slow down. That is one of the beauties of HST. Speed response is nearly instant. The feel you develop using HST is quickly learned to accomodate the rougher terrain. I find that my mowing speed varies throughout the course of mowing from about 2 mph to as fast as 5 mph. All that is easily done on HST without any shifting. For my pond bank mowing work which has very steep banks and would eat a tractor alive if it went in, the HST is truely a work of art, I can't think of a better, safer way to tackle the job. The instant forward/reverse ability plus the HST ability to "almost" lock up the tractor when in the neutral position is a gigantic benefit.
I look at each tranmissions benefits like this.
FST
1. time proven gear design
2. less cost
3. shuttle is very nice, makes F/R a snap, a real bonus for loader work
4. more efficient transfer of HP compared to HST
5. less heat generated
6. full ability to operate differential braking
GST
1. most of the benefits of FST but a little more costly
2. the L30's use electric solenoids now to speed up gear changes
3. snap to use
HST
1. while not "time proven", reliability from 3 Kubota dealers say they have not had failures period. I'm on my 2nd HST tractor, both have been flawless.
2. instant speed response, slow to fast, fast to slow and everything in between.
3. nearly instant forward/reverse
4. the need for brakes is almost eliminated. In neutral, the HST almost locks the tractor.
5. constant PTO RPM while changing speed. IE, in medium, I can go from 0 mph to 7.5 mph and every imaginable speed in between. Since I rarely mow at PTO speed, medium is probably closer to 0 to 6 mph.
6. Super for loader work, least amount of jarring to the tractor and operator.
7. Even though HST still uses a clutch, it is rarely used and the likelyhood of it ever wearing out is not very likely.
I'm sure there are many more positive aspects for all transmission types, all are excellent transmissions. Any one will fill your needs well. Todays shuttles are a great improvement over the manual F/R shift and for many folks is quite adequate. That includes the GST. As more electrical is introduced though as is the case with GST, just be aware you may someday face a situation where you can't shift if a solenoid does not operate be it a shorted wire, a open wire or a bad solenoid until it is repaired. Perhaps that has all been well designed and will never be a issue. Talk it over with the dealer. Neither HST or FST use electrical componets to shift. Whatever you decide, no transmission is a mistake, just different, Rat...
P.S. I have in addition to my Kubota
L3830, an International 454. While big and powerful, I much, much prefer the
L3830.