I resent you making this this statement.
If you disagree with me that is fine, you have a right to do so. You do not have the right to personally attack me.
You once complained that people don't seem to want the benefit of your experience, then you personally attack me for offering people the benefit of mine.
Explaining that the mythological persona about Imron being a stand alone exceptional product is false, does not benefit me in any way. I offer this information solely for those who are open minded, and want listen.
I have actually worked with people who developed some of these products, doing product testing, and have used these products extensively.
The profits from these products are high, and these companies will often go to any length, to be competitive. I have seen paint company's hire competitor's developers. In one case, a company hired a whole department. Sometimes they buy other companies out right, to get new technology. And of course, they use high tech chemical analyzers to backwards engineer products, and create their own versions.
The fact is they all have the similar technology within about a year of someone coming out with a new product. They have to, or they lose market share. That is reality.
The paint company that has the largest share of the market for a certain product, at a given time, does not necessarily have the best product. This is more often the result of how much they are willing to give away, to entice users to switch to their product.
If you are a high enough volume user, paint companies will offer to convert you to their product by making offers you can't refuse. Those who already have the larger share of the market, have more profit to work with, so they have the advantage in these price wars.