Sigarms
Super Member
I'm only laughing at people's perceptions on dogs.Laugh all you want - our foster homes never got a say in who we adopted too, that was not their job or function in my organization. I did inspections on our foster homes and would cancel them from our program because they failed to keep up with the standards of our foster home contract - I had the right to do spot inspections, as did certain members of my staff, all spelled out in the contract and enforceable in court, which we had to do, unfortunately, because we failed do the proper and complete vetting of the foster home applicant in the early days of our rescue.
It is actually great that you had a legal contract spelled out in court that was enforceable by law.
To some extent, our own contract was laid out the same way per "legal jargon", thing is, in rural NC where unwanted dogs are a dime a dozen, we never pushed the aspect of a legal contract other than telling the prospective new animal owner that if the contract is broken, we have a legal right to get the animal back.
I apologize if you misconstrued my comment in error.
However, after re reading your post, the reality is I misconstrued your written word. I thought you were refering to applications to adpot and not for the foster homes I do find it interesting that the organization is yours and yours alone. We came into the same issue with "society organizations" who couldn't follow their own by laws because it became some kind of power trip to have over people by people running the organization by the "elected president", which I found perplexing when people are just volunteering to try and help unwanted dogs out.
Take 15% of our county population and make that 15% dogs and cats. That's how many are put down in our county alone every single year.
All that said, personally I thought we made great foster parents
Last edited: