Traction wheel weights or fill the tires?

   / wheel weights or fill the tires? #21  
here is my .02 cents for rim guard versus weights:
1. My turf tires are loaded - about 450 - 500 pounds. No problem to install and remove them. If they fall over while rolling them - let them. I am 170 pounds and can tip them back up. You always have the weight on the tractor and it provides great stability and a lower center of gravity. Do they mash down my lawn - yes - but after a few days - no problem. If I get a hole in one...I put the hole at the top and plug. It does put less stress versus weights on the bearings if that is a concern for you - but it doesn't bother me. Its nice to have the stability and the weight when doing light loader work.
2. Wheel weights - very expensive (in metal) to get an equivalent amount of weight on the rim and a pain in the neck to man handle when installing and removing. They are so dense that crushed fingers and toes are a distinct possibility. If I had to remove the tires - I would have to remove the weights first and then the tire. Otherwise - I am guessing here....the tires with the weights still mounted would be very much off balanced and difficult to roll to a safe place If they tipped over - since the weight is concetrated towards the center of the rim - it would take a lot of strenght to stand them back up again.
 
   / wheel weights or fill the tires? #23  
How much weight would RimGuard add to my tractor. (picture below)

According to tractor data you have 12-16.5 tires on your massey. Then over to rim gaurd website and they say 15 gallons of rg for a total of 160.5 pounds per tire.
 
   / wheel weights or fill the tires? #24  
Scotty Dive

''It does put less stress versus weights on the bearings if that is a concern for you - but it doesn't bother me''

Could you elaborate on this. I just can't picture it. :confused2: Does using wheels weight really add more stress to the bearing. Am I that hardheaded. I know that it has very little consequences on the bearing if any at all, but this added stress on the axle keeps popping up, and I seem to be the only one not getting it. It must be a french thing. ;)
 
   / wheel weights or fill the tires? #25  
The best I can describe it is the wieghts pull downward and out on the axle because the weight is fixed onto the rim....the fluid rolls within the rim and does not tortionally stress the bearing.

Hopefully someone smarter than me who REALY knows can correct me or add to it.:laughing::laughing::laughing:
 
   / wheel weights or fill the tires? #26  
How much weight would RimGuard add to my tractor. (picture below)
Those aren't very big tires. I'd say you'd gain about 165# per tire, assuming a 75% fill of RimGuard. I filled all four R4s on my JD3720, which hold a quite a bit more than yours. I gained about 475# per rear tire and about 80# per front tire; about half a metric ton of RimGuard ballast. But it's strictly for everyday traction and side hill stability (the cab makes my JD a bit top heavy). When I have loader work to do, I mount a 900# ballast box on the rear hitch.

In my book, neither wheel weights nor liquid ballast should impose any additional stress on tractor components. Fuel economy is going to be affected, yes. But to me that's a fair trade-off for the additional stability (and confidence) I've gained for working my Kentucky hillside property.

//greg//
 
   / wheel weights or fill the tires? #27  
   / wheel weights or fill the tires? #28  
How much was the second set of wheels & tires? As expensive as it is, isn't steel cheaper?
 
   / wheel weights or fill the tires? #29  
There is a nominal increase in stress on any rotating part directly related to driving a tire/wheel combination when additional weight is applied to the end of the lever arm such as in this scenario. This is to me unavoidable. This opinion said, the amount is negligible and well within the design parameters of the manufacturer. I did not mean to imply that one should not ballast due to concern about a failure or issue with excess wear. Quite the contrary, NOT ballasting and having increased slippage and instability is not only unsafe, but potentially could place the same assembly under more erratic and potentially more-harmful load surges which could offer the potential of far worse consequences. I have found in loader applications especially, most of us, including myself are under-ballasted. In many cases, both solid and liquid wheel-mounted weight is needed, in addition to adding a heavy hitch-mounted ballast, such as a box blade or ballast box. My main point in my previous post is that not all tasks done by a tractor really need ballast, but for most of us ballasting has become a needed part of our usage. I would argue mowing on even terrain or doing light-duty pulling on pavement, are tasks that do not require ballast and likely suffer some detriment for being ballasted. In those cases, I would surmise that one would be best to favor solid and potentially removable ballast if it fits within one's budget, though as noted by other posters, this task is often fraught with losing skin and injury potential. In short, concern about axle and bearing stress is, in my opinion, far outweighed by the potential benefit and added safety of ballast. I also feel liquid ballast, in most cases is the better way to go for most of us, as many of us are highly unlikely to be pulling 400 pounds+ per wheel of solid ballast on and off our machines.

John M
 
   / wheel weights or fill the tires? #30  
For anyone wanting to add weight on the cheap, here's what I did on my old B6200.

The rear wheel center disc is just the right size to fit a plastic 5 gallon pail onto if you cut the plastic lip off. And there are three 9/16" holes in the wheel rim that are not lug nut holes.

So I took a wheel off and made a 1/4" plywood pattern to match the center hole for the axle and the three holes. Then I used 1/2" threaded rod through the pattern, and welded some scrap steel on the other end that would be inside the bucket so the rods wouldn't turn when I torqued the bolts onto the wheel.

Each 5 gallon pail takes a 80# bag of redi mix. I poured the concrete and imbedded the threaded rod with the plywood pattern attached and let them cure for 3 days.

It is practically impossible for me to mount the 80# weights by myself but it is easy when you remove the tire/wheel and mount it on top of the weights, then mount the weighted wheel back on the tractor.

Not as good as Rim guard or store bought weights but I was able to add 160# of weight to my rear axle for about $20 and some time. The buckets can later be removed but I left them on. They do stick out to much for mowing but work great during the winter. If you wanted it to stick out less and willing to go a little less weight, you could put a dead space on the bottom of the bucket before you pour concrete and then remove the buckets after the cure.

I also built a home made weight box that I can use on the front or the rear that has 4 removable 40# concrete formed weights with the steel box weighing probably another 80 pounds. That was a little more money because I bought steel for the box. A little off topic but might help others reading this thread.

http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/customization/162564-homemade-front-rear-ballast-box.html
 

Attachments

  • IMAG1022.jpg
    IMAG1022.jpg
    653.9 KB · Views: 431
Last edited:

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2019 Fontaine EQ1 Hydraulic Spreader Arm (A49461)
2019 Fontaine EQ1...
2014 Gillig Transport Bus (A50323)
2014 Gillig...
2019 CATERPILLAR 259D SKID STEER (A51242)
2019 CATERPILLAR...
2018 JCB 505-TC 5,500lb 4x4 Rough Terrain Telehandler (A49461)
2018 JCB 505-TC...
2014 STEPHENS 200BBL TANKER TRAILER (A50854)
2014 STEPHENS...
2018 RoGator 1100C (A51039)
2018 RoGator 1100C...
 
Top